Every time I have tried making a linear regression for voltage vs temperature, it ends up accurate for cooler temps and off by as much as 2 degrees for hotter temps. I was able to collect 5 data points in 20 minutes and each was in a different temperature range. When I collected 30 data points, I discovered that the slope for hotter temps is much greater than for cooler temps. Is there another type of regression that models this more accurately?MoMoney$$$;)0) wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:49 pmMore than doable with the right tools. This can be like quickly using a good graphing calculator to take points with corresponding voltage and temperature. Then finding a line of best fit. Personally I've done it in a time crunch, with a little under 20 minutes. Definitely can happen.MTV<=>Operator wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:45 pmChanging it as in adding a constant? I don't see how one could find new coefficients in the 20 minutes of allotted calibration time.MoMoney$$$;)0) wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:13 pm
It's quite easily actually once you know what you're doing, and if you're acquainted with the language you're working with. I'm pretty sure he's talking about using the Stienhart-Hart equation given with a thermistor, and then changing it with some testing.
Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
-
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
THHS '21 Builder Cult Member
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020: GV (9 YUSO, 5 NYC), Detector (8 YUSO, 7 NYC), WS (10 NYC), PPP
2020-2021 Events/ Yosemite/HUSO/River Hill/ NYC South Regional
Vehicle Design / 1/--/--/--
WICI / 3/--/--/--
Circuits /--/ 3/ 5/ 1
Machines /--/ 4/ 2/ 2
Detector /--/--/ 2/--
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020: GV (9 YUSO, 5 NYC), Detector (8 YUSO, 7 NYC), WS (10 NYC), PPP
2020-2021 Events/ Yosemite/HUSO/River Hill/ NYC South Regional
Vehicle Design / 1/--/--/--
WICI / 3/--/--/--
Circuits /--/ 3/ 5/ 1
Machines /--/ 4/ 2/ 2
Detector /--/--/ 2/--
-
- Member
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 6:38 pm
- Division: C
- State: OH
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
A non-linear regression with multiple parts, with set ranges you already have set. I use a tinspire where I can sort through data, and then easily look through the data. Then you put it into data and statistics, go into regression and test all of the types of regression for the best fit. Personally, I have found using multiple parts with polynomial functions to work the best.MTV<=>Operator wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:02 pmEvery time I have tried making a linear regression for voltage vs temperature, it ends up accurate for cooler temps and off by as much as 2 degrees for hotter temps. I was able to collect 5 data points in 20 minutes and each was in a different temperature range. When I collected 30 data points, I discovered that the slope for hotter temps is much greater than for cooler temps. Is there another type of regression that models this more accurately?MoMoney$$$;)0) wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:49 pmMore than doable with the right tools. This can be like quickly using a good graphing calculator to take points with corresponding voltage and temperature. Then finding a line of best fit. Personally I've done it in a time crunch, with a little under 20 minutes. Definitely can happen.MTV<=>Operator wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:45 pm Changing it as in adding a constant? I don't see how one could find new coefficients in the 20 minutes of allotted calibration time.
Division C - Northeast Ohio
Gravity Vehicle
Machines
Detector Building
Circuit Lab
Protein Modeling
2019-2020 Medal Count: 5
"Don't be upset by the results you didn't get from the work you didn't do'
Memberships: Builder Cult
Gravity Vehicle
Machines
Detector Building
Circuit Lab
Protein Modeling
2019-2020 Medal Count: 5
"Don't be upset by the results you didn't get from the work you didn't do'
Memberships: Builder Cult
-
- Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 6:36 am
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
Has anyone else notices that pretty much the only thing that matters is how precise the calibration thermometers are?
-
- Member
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 2:53 pm
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
it's not really the only thing that matters -- usually, the thermometers are precise enough, and your device really does still have a huge impact on your results, but if a thermometer isn't precise it can indeed throw a team off by a considerable margin. It's just one of the many things that are wrong with this event.lameloball wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 6:39 am Has anyone else notices that pretty much the only thing that matters is how precise the calibration thermometers are?
ntso
quack quack
quack quack
-
- Member
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 3:34 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
If it is regional, you bring your own thermometer and you have unlimited time to calibrate it before coming to competition. As long as the thermometer is repeatable, you should be able to calibrate your device to it.ericlepanda wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 6:50 amit's not really the only thing that matters -- usually, the thermometers are precise enough, and your device really does still have a huge impact on your results, but if a thermometer isn't precise it can indeed throw a team off by a considerable margin. It's just one of the many things that are wrong with this event.lameloball wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 6:39 am Has anyone else notices that pretty much the only thing that matters is how precise the calibration thermometers are?
-
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
Is there any reason why a team would not calibrate at all at a state competition? I recall seeing a top team not calibrate at an invitational and they got first place in the event. Also what is a sufficient number of values to collect when calibrating?
THHS '21 Builder Cult Member
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020: GV (9 YUSO, 5 NYC), Detector (8 YUSO, 7 NYC), WS (10 NYC), PPP
2020-2021 Events/ Yosemite/HUSO/River Hill/ NYC South Regional
Vehicle Design / 1/--/--/--
WICI / 3/--/--/--
Circuits /--/ 3/ 5/ 1
Machines /--/ 4/ 2/ 2
Detector /--/--/ 2/--
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020: GV (9 YUSO, 5 NYC), Detector (8 YUSO, 7 NYC), WS (10 NYC), PPP
2020-2021 Events/ Yosemite/HUSO/River Hill/ NYC South Regional
Vehicle Design / 1/--/--/--
WICI / 3/--/--/--
Circuits /--/ 3/ 5/ 1
Machines /--/ 4/ 2/ 2
Detector /--/--/ 2/--
-
- Member
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 3:34 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
We did at invitation running state rule. 5 data points from scratch for thermistor, 0.1, 0.0, 0.1, 0.2.