Every time I have tried making a linear regression for voltage vs temperature, it ends up accurate for cooler temps and off by as much as 2 degrees for hotter temps. I was able to collect 5 data points in 20 minutes and each was in a different temperature range. When I collected 30 data points, I discovered that the slope for hotter temps is much greater than for cooler temps. Is there another type of regression that models this more accurately?MoMoney$$$;)0) wrote: ↑February 18th, 2020, 5:49 pmMore than doable with the right tools. This can be like quickly using a good graphing calculator to take points with corresponding voltage and temperature. Then finding a line of best fit. Personally I've done it in a time crunch, with a little under 20 minutes. Definitely can happen.MTV<=>Operator wrote: ↑February 18th, 2020, 5:45 pmChanging it as in adding a constant? I don't see how one could find new coefficients in the 20 minutes of allotted calibration time.MoMoney$$$;)0) wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 7:13 pm
It's quite easily actually once you know what you're doing, and if you're acquainted with the language you're working with. I'm pretty sure he's talking about using the Stienhart-Hart equation given with a thermistor, and then changing it with some testing.
Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
- MTV<=>Operator
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: February 8th, 2019, 12:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
THHS '21 Builder Cult Member
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020: GV (9 YUSO, 5 NYC), Detector (8 YUSO, 7 NYC), WS (10 NYC), PPP
2020-2021 Events/ Yosemite/HUSO/River Hill/ NYC South Regional
Vehicle Design / 1/--/--/--
WICI / 3/--/--/--
Circuits /--/ 3/ 5/ 1
Machines /--/ 4/ 2/ 2
Detector /--/--/ 2/--
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020: GV (9 YUSO, 5 NYC), Detector (8 YUSO, 7 NYC), WS (10 NYC), PPP
2020-2021 Events/ Yosemite/HUSO/River Hill/ NYC South Regional
Vehicle Design / 1/--/--/--
WICI / 3/--/--/--
Circuits /--/ 3/ 5/ 1
Machines /--/ 4/ 2/ 2
Detector /--/--/ 2/--
- MoMoney$$$;)0)
- Member
- Posts: 154
- Joined: January 14th, 2019, 6:38 pm
- Division: C
- State: OH
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
A non-linear regression with multiple parts, with set ranges you already have set. I use a tinspire where I can sort through data, and then easily look through the data. Then you put it into data and statistics, go into regression and test all of the types of regression for the best fit. Personally, I have found using multiple parts with polynomial functions to work the best.MTV<=>Operator wrote: ↑February 18th, 2020, 6:02 pmEvery time I have tried making a linear regression for voltage vs temperature, it ends up accurate for cooler temps and off by as much as 2 degrees for hotter temps. I was able to collect 5 data points in 20 minutes and each was in a different temperature range. When I collected 30 data points, I discovered that the slope for hotter temps is much greater than for cooler temps. Is there another type of regression that models this more accurately?MoMoney$$$;)0) wrote: ↑February 18th, 2020, 5:49 pmMore than doable with the right tools. This can be like quickly using a good graphing calculator to take points with corresponding voltage and temperature. Then finding a line of best fit. Personally I've done it in a time crunch, with a little under 20 minutes. Definitely can happen.MTV<=>Operator wrote: ↑February 18th, 2020, 5:45 pm Changing it as in adding a constant? I don't see how one could find new coefficients in the 20 minutes of allotted calibration time.
Division C - Northeast Ohio
Gravity Vehicle
Machines
Detector Building
Circuit Lab
Protein Modeling
2019-2020 Medal Count: 5
"Don't be upset by the results you didn't get from the work you didn't do'
Memberships: Builder Cult
Gravity Vehicle
Machines
Detector Building
Circuit Lab
Protein Modeling
2019-2020 Medal Count: 5
"Don't be upset by the results you didn't get from the work you didn't do'
Memberships: Builder Cult
-
- Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: March 2nd, 2020, 6:36 am
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
Has anyone else notices that pretty much the only thing that matters is how precise the calibration thermometers are?
-
- Member
- Posts: 69
- Joined: February 9th, 2016, 2:53 pm
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
it's not really the only thing that matters -- usually, the thermometers are precise enough, and your device really does still have a huge impact on your results, but if a thermometer isn't precise it can indeed throw a team off by a considerable margin. It's just one of the many things that are wrong with this event.lameloball wrote: ↑March 2nd, 2020, 6:39 am Has anyone else notices that pretty much the only thing that matters is how precise the calibration thermometers are?
ntso
quack quack
quack quack
-
- Member
- Posts: 171
- Joined: March 16th, 2017, 3:34 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
If it is regional, you bring your own thermometer and you have unlimited time to calibrate it before coming to competition. As long as the thermometer is repeatable, you should be able to calibrate your device to it.ericlepanda wrote: ↑March 2nd, 2020, 6:50 amit's not really the only thing that matters -- usually, the thermometers are precise enough, and your device really does still have a huge impact on your results, but if a thermometer isn't precise it can indeed throw a team off by a considerable margin. It's just one of the many things that are wrong with this event.lameloball wrote: ↑March 2nd, 2020, 6:39 am Has anyone else notices that pretty much the only thing that matters is how precise the calibration thermometers are?
- MTV<=>Operator
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: February 8th, 2019, 12:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Accuracy of Detectors (Overall)
Is there any reason why a team would not calibrate at all at a state competition? I recall seeing a top team not calibrate at an invitational and they got first place in the event. Also what is a sufficient number of values to collect when calibrating?
THHS '21 Builder Cult Member
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020: GV (9 YUSO, 5 NYC), Detector (8 YUSO, 7 NYC), WS (10 NYC), PPP
2020-2021 Events/ Yosemite/HUSO/River Hill/ NYC South Regional
Vehicle Design / 1/--/--/--
WICI / 3/--/--/--
Circuits /--/ 3/ 5/ 1
Machines /--/ 4/ 2/ 2
Detector /--/--/ 2/--
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020: GV (9 YUSO, 5 NYC), Detector (8 YUSO, 7 NYC), WS (10 NYC), PPP
2020-2021 Events/ Yosemite/HUSO/River Hill/ NYC South Regional
Vehicle Design / 1/--/--/--
WICI / 3/--/--/--
Circuits /--/ 3/ 5/ 1
Machines /--/ 4/ 2/ 2
Detector /--/--/ 2/--
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests