2021 Golden Gate Invitational (C)
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:49 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: 2021 Golden Gate Invitational (C)
Event Reviews:
Astronomy (14th): We unstacked, so being split from my usual partner meant I had to carry math, even though I'm a DSO person. That being said, I found all the math to be pretty manageable, and I mostly lost points because of sillies (e.g., using bolometric luminosity to calculate distance when the visible apparent magnitude is given, forgetting that period is squared in Kepler's 3rd law, etc. ). I got through pretty much the entire math section too, so I definitely would have expected something harder, though I heard the DSO section was relatively hard. Good test nevetheless.
Fossils (23rd): Apparently we were only like 12 points away from 7th, so it doesn't seem like the score distribution was that good. Despite that, I thought the test was pretty good and covered all the content well.
Geologic Mapping (4th): Test was wayyy too easy (my partner and I finished in around 32 minutes, and I heard many other teams finished in around that amount of time). The test was fairly long (112 questions), but mostly easy multiple choice. Like Fossils, the score distribution was not great from what I could gather.
Protein Modeling (14th): Not much to say about this, was a pretty good test in my opinion. No major complaints.
Overall (8th/7th superscored): I guess I was a little disappointed overall, mostly because Designer Genes had to be trialed. The Scilympiad issues during Block 1 and the Onshape issues were pretty unfortunate, but not much could have been done about those.
I guess the main takeaway from the results is that NJ IS OFFICIALLY THE MOST COMPETITIVE STATE IN THE COUNTRY.
Astronomy (14th): We unstacked, so being split from my usual partner meant I had to carry math, even though I'm a DSO person. That being said, I found all the math to be pretty manageable, and I mostly lost points because of sillies (e.g., using bolometric luminosity to calculate distance when the visible apparent magnitude is given, forgetting that period is squared in Kepler's 3rd law, etc. ). I got through pretty much the entire math section too, so I definitely would have expected something harder, though I heard the DSO section was relatively hard. Good test nevetheless.
Fossils (23rd): Apparently we were only like 12 points away from 7th, so it doesn't seem like the score distribution was that good. Despite that, I thought the test was pretty good and covered all the content well.
Geologic Mapping (4th): Test was wayyy too easy (my partner and I finished in around 32 minutes, and I heard many other teams finished in around that amount of time). The test was fairly long (112 questions), but mostly easy multiple choice. Like Fossils, the score distribution was not great from what I could gather.
Protein Modeling (14th): Not much to say about this, was a pretty good test in my opinion. No major complaints.
Overall (8th/7th superscored): I guess I was a little disappointed overall, mostly because Designer Genes had to be trialed. The Scilympiad issues during Block 1 and the Onshape issues were pretty unfortunate, but not much could have been done about those.
I guess the main takeaway from the results is that NJ IS OFFICIALLY THE MOST COMPETITIVE STATE IN THE COUNTRY.
Last edited by pb5754 on Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- These users thanked the author pb5754 for the post (total 3):
- Giantpants (Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:29 pm) • builderguy135 (Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:41 am) • Adi1008 (Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:52 am)
West Windsor-Plainsboro High School South '21
2021 Nationals: Astronomy - 1st, Geologic Mapping - 1st, Team - 6th
2021 Nationals: Astronomy - 1st, Geologic Mapping - 1st, Team - 6th
-
- Member
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:40 am
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: 2021 Golden Gate Invitational (C)
Circuit Lab
Hi everyone! AngelMB and I were the test writers and supervisors for Circuit Lab at GGSO! First off, we just want to thank everyone for competing! We know there were some technical difficulties but everyone handled it very well, and for the most part the event went pretty smoothly. For this test, Angel and I’s main goal was to make the test very long as opposed to very difficult (although we did of course include plenty of difficult questions) as we believed that with the large number of teams it would be best to try to discern teams based not only on their skill but their efficiency as well. As an added bonus, it hopefully discourages cheating as teams looking to use the internet for answers wouldn’t have nearly enough time to complete the test this way. Now onto the test itself!
The test was 102 questions (382 points) split 2:1 between MC/True-False and calculation/fill in the blank with ~53% of the points coming from the latter. We did need to remove one question due to an error on our end but it didn’t have much of an impact overall. Because of the length of the test, only 11 teams actually got to answering every question, however, the majority of teams got to at least 80 questions. As for the content of the test, the area that the fewest teams were able to get points on were the more complex magnetism and circuit analysis questions. As for magnetism, this was to be expected since there are some many obscure magnetism formulas and equations. We decided to make the toughest magnetism questions based on formulas that weren’t obscure enough to be unreasonable, however the two toughest questions (B, H, and M fields/force between two surfaces) were correctly answered by 5 and 1 teams respectively! The troubles with the circuit analysis came on the questions concerning transistors, zener diodes, and one of the RC circuit questions. These were all college level questions though, so no major surprises there. There was one question that no one got right, although two teams got partial credit! This was the question concerning the impedance of a capacitor. Honestly, this question walks the tightrope between being allowed and not allowed, but we decided to include it nonetheless.
We were happy with the spread of the scores (peep the nice looking histogram below) and overall very impressed with how all teams did, especially the top few teams who hovered around 75%. A few questions we were surprised by how few teams knew (i.e. the question on dielectric leakage), but we were still glad to see so many teams do well! You can find stats and graphs below, and if anyone has any questions feel free to message me! See you all for my next test
Avg: 152.374
Q1: 124
Med: 143
Q2: 176.5
St. Dev.: 47.6731
Hi everyone! AngelMB and I were the test writers and supervisors for Circuit Lab at GGSO! First off, we just want to thank everyone for competing! We know there were some technical difficulties but everyone handled it very well, and for the most part the event went pretty smoothly. For this test, Angel and I’s main goal was to make the test very long as opposed to very difficult (although we did of course include plenty of difficult questions) as we believed that with the large number of teams it would be best to try to discern teams based not only on their skill but their efficiency as well. As an added bonus, it hopefully discourages cheating as teams looking to use the internet for answers wouldn’t have nearly enough time to complete the test this way. Now onto the test itself!
The test was 102 questions (382 points) split 2:1 between MC/True-False and calculation/fill in the blank with ~53% of the points coming from the latter. We did need to remove one question due to an error on our end but it didn’t have much of an impact overall. Because of the length of the test, only 11 teams actually got to answering every question, however, the majority of teams got to at least 80 questions. As for the content of the test, the area that the fewest teams were able to get points on were the more complex magnetism and circuit analysis questions. As for magnetism, this was to be expected since there are some many obscure magnetism formulas and equations. We decided to make the toughest magnetism questions based on formulas that weren’t obscure enough to be unreasonable, however the two toughest questions (B, H, and M fields/force between two surfaces) were correctly answered by 5 and 1 teams respectively! The troubles with the circuit analysis came on the questions concerning transistors, zener diodes, and one of the RC circuit questions. These were all college level questions though, so no major surprises there. There was one question that no one got right, although two teams got partial credit! This was the question concerning the impedance of a capacitor. Honestly, this question walks the tightrope between being allowed and not allowed, but we decided to include it nonetheless.
We were happy with the spread of the scores (peep the nice looking histogram below) and overall very impressed with how all teams did, especially the top few teams who hovered around 75%. A few questions we were surprised by how few teams knew (i.e. the question on dielectric leakage), but we were still glad to see so many teams do well! You can find stats and graphs below, and if anyone has any questions feel free to message me! See you all for my next test
Avg: 152.374
Q1: 124
Med: 143
Q2: 176.5
St. Dev.: 47.6731
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- These users thanked the author jaggie34 for the post (total 6):
- Adi1008 (Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:34 pm) • AngelMB (Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:34 pm) • pepperonipi (Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:56 pm) • RobertYL (Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:01 pm) • Giantpants (Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:31 pm) • sciolyman24 (Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:12 am)
Boca Raton High School -> Georgia Tech
It's About Time writer/co-writer: Golden Gate, Georgia States
Ping Pong Parachute co-ES: MIT
Florida Game On C and Fermi Questions C champion!
and Circuit Lab too I guess
It's About Time writer/co-writer: Golden Gate, Georgia States
Ping Pong Parachute co-ES: MIT
Florida Game On C and Fermi Questions C champion!
and Circuit Lab too I guess
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2406
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 165 times
- Been thanked: 734 times
Re: 2021 Golden Gate Invitational (C)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- These users thanked the author bernard for the post (total 3):
- sciolyperson1 (Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:53 pm) • Godspeed (Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:53 am) • Name (Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:45 am)
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:09 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: 2021 Golden Gate Invitational (C)
Applications for the 2021-2022 Golden Gate Science Olympiad Board of Directors is now live! The application is open to all incoming Berkeley and Stanford students and is due by May 14th.
Apply HERE:
Email: goldengatescioly@gmail.com
Website: goldengateso.com
Apply HERE:
Email: goldengatescioly@gmail.com
Website: goldengateso.com
UC Berkeley
Seven Lakes High School '19
Seven Lakes High School '19