Boomilever B/C

User avatar
MadCow2357
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2017 9:09 am
Division: C
State: RI
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by MadCow2357 »

sciolyperson1 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 8:32 am From 2001:
"
The Winning boom was made by an amazing girl from california. It weighed 7.7 and held it all, so it was very high. 2nd was harriton with a 8. something boom, and 3rd was solon with a 9.6 gram boom. dont know any others
id love to chat about boom
steven
"

Source: https://scioly.org/obb/viewtopic.php?t=291&start=1#2

At this point in time, 15000g was "full weight" as well. However, score was determined by:

mass held/mass device + mass held/10
Is this going to apply to digital structures this year?
MadCow2357's Userpage
Gallagher MS '19
Barrington HS '23
User avatar
sciolyperson1
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1068
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:13 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 597 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by sciolyperson1 »

MadCow2357 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 11:01 am Is this going to apply to digital structures this year?
sciolyperson1 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 8:32 am From 2001:
BirdSO Tournament Director, SoCal Planning Team
WW-P HSN '22, Community MS '18
Sciolyperson1's Userpage
User avatar
MadCow2357
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2017 9:09 am
Division: C
State: RI
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by MadCow2357 »

sciolyperson1 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 11:52 am
MadCow2357 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 11:01 am Is this going to apply to digital structures this year?
sciolyperson1 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 8:32 am From 2001:
I know, I was just wondering why you suddenly posted something from 2001 lol
MadCow2357's Userpage
Gallagher MS '19
Barrington HS '23
User avatar
sciolyperson1
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1068
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:13 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 597 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by sciolyperson1 »

MadCow2357 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 11:55 am
sciolyperson1 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 11:52 am
MadCow2357 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 11:01 am Is this going to apply to digital structures this year?
sciolyperson1 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 8:32 am From 2001:
I know, I was just wondering why you suddenly posted something from 2001 lol
viewtopic.php?f=24&p=427491#p427491
These users thanked the author sciolyperson1 for the post:
sneepity (Sat Sep 26, 2020 1:15 pm)
BirdSO Tournament Director, SoCal Planning Team
WW-P HSN '22, Community MS '18
Sciolyperson1's Userpage
Godspeed
Member
Member
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2020 10:16 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 87 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by Godspeed »

Hello everybody. Do the contact width lines only apply for the bottom portion of the Boomilever. By that I mean does the contact width line not matter for the J Hook part of the boomilever?
User avatar
AstroClarinet
Member
Member
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:56 am
Division: C
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by AstroClarinet »

Godspeed wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2020 9:43 pm Hello everybody. Do the contact width lines only apply for the bottom portion of the Boomilever. By that I mean does the contact width line not matter for the J Hook part of the boomilever?
Rules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
AstroClarinet's Userpage
Nats 2022: Remote sensing 3rd, Astronomy 6th
 Astro, Genes, Water, DigiStructures, Solar System, Boomi, Density, Eco, Optics, Towers, Microbe, Mission Possible
User avatar
xiangyu
Member
Member
Posts: 276
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2019 8:32 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by xiangyu »

AstroClarinet wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:29 am
Godspeed wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2020 9:43 pm Hello everybody. Do the contact width lines only apply for the bottom portion of the Boomilever. By that I mean does the contact width line not matter for the J Hook part of the boomilever?
Rules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
Yep.
Medal & Ribbon Count: 33
Former EGRHS Team Captain 2017-2021
https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Xiangyu
Godspeed
Member
Member
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2020 10:16 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 87 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by Godspeed »

AstroClarinet wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:29 am
Godspeed wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2020 9:43 pm Hello everybody. Do the contact width lines only apply for the bottom portion of the Boomilever. By that I mean does the contact width line not matter for the J Hook part of the boomilever?
Rules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
Wait but how does that work? if It's on the hook, then it's guaranteed to be in between the contact width lines, right?
User avatar
Umaroth
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:51 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 161 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by Umaroth »

Godspeed wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 12:06 pm
AstroClarinet wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:29 am
Godspeed wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2020 9:43 pm Hello everybody. Do the contact width lines only apply for the bottom portion of the Boomilever. By that I mean does the contact width line not matter for the J Hook part of the boomilever?
Rules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
Wait but how does that work? if It's on the hook, then it's guaranteed to be in between the contact width lines, right?
But it's not touching the wall, it's touching the hook
Cal 2026
Troy SciOly 2021 Co-Captain
Proud Padre of the Evola SciOly Program 2018-now
Dank Memes Area Homeschool Juggernaut 2018-now
Sierra Vista SciOly Co-Head Coach 2020-now

Umaroth's Userpage
User avatar
sneepity
Member
Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2020 2:35 pm
Division: B
State: NY
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
Has thanked: 942 times
Been thanked: 203 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by sneepity »

Umaroth wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 12:54 pm
Godspeed wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 12:06 pm
AstroClarinet wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:29 am

Rules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
Wait but how does that work? if It's on the hook, then it's guaranteed to be in between the contact width lines, right?
But it's not touching the wall, it's touching the hook
It'll have to hang from the hook, so it's not the wall. All other parts will have to touch the wall for the boomi to carry the load.
B)

Return to “Boomilever B/C”