Indiana Science Olympiad
-
- Member
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:13 pm
- Division: B
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Indiana Science Olympiad
I still don't know how I bombed Road Scholar so badly at states.........
WWMS 2010-2011!
Events:
Microbe Mission
Shock Value
Experimental Design
???????????
Events:
Microbe Mission
Shock Value
Experimental Design
???????????
-
- Member
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:38 am
- Division: C
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Indiana Science Olympiad
i know what you meansciolyandmathcounts wrote:I still don't know how I bombed Road Scholar so badly at states.........
University of Michigan Aerospace Engineering
Munster High School, Indiana
2015 Nationals: Bridge 12th; Air Traj 7th; Scrambler 6th; Geo Maps 5th; Team 6th!
"Science Olympiad is, was, and always will be one of the greatest things that ever happened to me."
Munster High School, Indiana
2015 Nationals: Bridge 12th; Air Traj 7th; Scrambler 6th; Geo Maps 5th; Team 6th!
"Science Olympiad is, was, and always will be one of the greatest things that ever happened to me."
-
- Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:06 am
- Division: Grad
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Indiana Science Olympiad
Nope, live egg.ktrujillo52 wrote:I heard they intentionally broke their egg, is this true?
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:28 pm
- Division: C
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Indiana Science Olympiad
Did anyone here take the Remote Sensing test? After I took it I wasn't very impressed with it as I felt that it was a crap shoot considering the difficulty and nature of the test. It also made me angry that over half the test could be found here on this site along with the answer key (check out the 2009 Greenhill test). I would really expect a more well thought out test considering it was the state tournament. But besides this, the other events I participated in were very well run 

2010 events
Fossils, Dynamic Planet, Remote Sensing, Astronomy, Exp Design
Fossils, Dynamic Planet, Remote Sensing, Astronomy, Exp Design
-
- Member
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 12:24 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Indiana Science Olympiad
@kjtrujillo: didn't you rock out in A&P? I graded the endocrine and did the totals and I thought you got 6th or 7th. Don't sweat the bonus essay, like three teams actually successfully did one. And I graded it wicked harsh, so spending time elsewhere was the way to go. What I'm wracking my brains over is how was the endocrine so hard for people? The average on identifying hormone classes was about 30% (random guessing would yield 20%!). That was the very first thing listed in the rules! I even highlighted the 4 rings on the steroid structure I showed, and enlarged the iodine atoms in the thyroid hormone structure. Only Bloomington North managed to get even one third of the endocrine credit and they got almost all of it - but those same two girls won Health Science in 1999 as freshmen when endocrinology was a topic before, and they've won national medals twice since then, too... Questions that weren't very complicated and came from the rules in a relatively straightforward way really stumped people for the endocrine section, while they were answering much more complicated questions on the skeletal and muscular without a problem. I'm curious... did people just not study the endocrine system as much? Or were they expecting something different? It's true high school texts SUCK at covering the endocrine system. Maybe that's the problem?
Chem Lab was RIDICULOUS it was so competitive.
Environmental chemistry was... um... less competitive.
Although it was a TON of the same kids as Chem Lab. Perhaps I didn't correctly anticipate how much more difficult it is to study material that isn't in the normal high school curriculum.
Chem Lab was RIDICULOUS it was so competitive.

Environmental chemistry was... um... less competitive.

-
- Member
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:49 pm
- Division: C
- State: TN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Indiana Science Olympiad
Actually, I prefer endocrine over skeletal and muscular. Muscular is REALLY complicated. Endocrine is the way to go.peoneill wrote:@kjtrujillo: didn't you rock out in A&P? I graded the endocrine and did the totals and I thought you got 6th or 7th. Don't sweat the bonus essay, like three teams actually successfully did one. And I graded it wicked harsh, so spending time elsewhere was the way to go. What I'm wracking my brains over is how was the endocrine so hard for people? The average on identifying hormone classes was about 30% (random guessing would yield 20%!). That was the very first thing listed in the rules! I even highlighted the 4 rings on the steroid structure I showed, and enlarged the iodine atoms in the thyroid hormone structure. Only Bloomington North managed to get even one third of the endocrine credit and they got almost all of it - but those same two girls won Health Science in 1999 as freshmen when endocrinology was a topic before, and they've won national medals twice since then, too... Questions that weren't very complicated and came from the rules in a relatively straightforward way really stumped people for the endocrine section, while they were answering much more complicated questions on the skeletal and muscular without a problem. I'm curious... did people just not study the endocrine system as much? Or were they expecting something different? It's true high school texts SUCK at covering the endocrine system. Maybe that's the problem?
Chem Lab was RIDICULOUS it was so competitive.
Environmental chemistry was... um... less competitive.Although it was a TON of the same kids as Chem Lab. Perhaps I didn't correctly anticipate how much more difficult it is to study material that isn't in the normal high school curriculum.

2010 Events: Anatomy, Astronomy, Cell Biology, Protein Modeling
Looking forward to the '11 SO season!
Tennessee!
Looking forward to the '11 SO season!
Tennessee!
