Thermodynamics B/C Build
Posted: September 4th, 2018, 9:19 am
Please use this forum to discuss issues and questions on the build portion of Thermodynamics.
I think the point of the subforum was so that questions about the build could have their own threadTheChiScientist wrote:Please use this forum to discuss issues and questions on the build portion of Thermodynamics.
As I read over them with a fine tooth comb there are no removals that I can see. Although with the additions there goes my designs for a vacuum sealed box...UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:I think the point of the subforum was so that questions about the build could have their own threadTheChiScientist wrote:Please use this forum to discuss issues and questions on the build portion of Thermodynamics.Nevertheless, I suppose it makes sense to have a thread for minor questions.
Looks like the build hasn't really changed, besides being able to plug the hole. Can someone who has time check if there were any interesting deletions in the rules (because obviously they can't bold those)?
I feel like if you make one of those in house then it would be fine, you just can’t buy a commercial one and use it as part of your build.TheChiScientist wrote:As I read over them with a fine tooth comb there are no removals that I can see. Although with the additions there goes my designs for a vacuum sealed box...UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:I think the point of the subforum was so that questions about the build could have their own threadTheChiScientist wrote:Please use this forum to discuss issues and questions on the build portion of Thermodynamics.Nevertheless, I suppose it makes sense to have a thread for minor questions.
Looks like the build hasn't really changed, besides being able to plug the hole. Can someone who has time check if there were any interesting deletions in the rules (because obviously they can't bold those)?
Weren't you the one saying that aerogel wasn't worth the price last year?TheChiScientist wrote:As I read over them with a fine tooth comb there are no removals that I can see. Although with the additions there goes my designs for a vacuum sealed box...UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:I think the point of the subforum was so that questions about the build could have their own threadTheChiScientist wrote:Please use this forum to discuss issues and questions on the build portion of Thermodynamics.Nevertheless, I suppose it makes sense to have a thread for minor questions.
Looks like the build hasn't really changed, besides being able to plug the hole. Can someone who has time check if there were any interesting deletions in the rules (because obviously they can't bold those)?
They also removed the outside beaker, so the material of beakers might come into play (although the beaker does have to be unaltered).TheChiScientist wrote:Is it just me or did they get rid of the ice water bonus!?!?!?!?!??!?!! (smh how did I miss that!)
Interesting. So this year the score is going to be mainly dependent on Newton's law of cooling no?UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:They also removed the outside beaker, so the material of beakers might come into play (although the beaker does have to be unaltered).TheChiScientist wrote:Is it just me or did they get rid of the ice water bonus!?!?!?!?!??!?!! (smh how did I miss that!)
That's what it says in the rulesTheChiScientist wrote:Interesting. So this year the score is going to be mainly dependent on Newton's law of cooling no?UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:They also removed the outside beaker, so the material of beakers might come into play (although the beaker does have to be unaltered).TheChiScientist wrote:Is it just me or did they get rid of the ice water bonus!?!?!?!?!??!?!! (smh how did I miss that!)