Raw scores at nats predictions
-
- Member
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Raw scores at nats predictions
1:~3:30
2-4: >3:10
5-6: >3:05
This may be a little high considering it's a racquetball court and teams tend to have issues running into walls
2-4: >3:10
5-6: >3:05
This may be a little high considering it's a racquetball court and teams tend to have issues running into walls
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n): Hydro: 3/5/18 Robot Arm: na/1/1 Rocks: 1/1/1 2018 (r/s/n): Heli: 2/1/7 Herp: 1/4/4 Mission: 1/1/6 Rocks: 1/1/1 Eco: 6/3/9 2019 (r/s/n): Fossils: 1/1/1 GLM: 1/1/1 Herp: 1/1/5 Mission: 1/1/3 WS: 4/1/10 Top 3 Medals: 144 Golds: 80
-
- Member
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:44 pm
- Division: Grad
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Raw scores at nats predictions
Is the 3:30 an estimate from Troy? I've heard they've got in that range.ScottMaurer19 wrote:1:~3:30
2-4: >3:10
5-6: >3:05
This may be a little high considering it's a racquetball court and teams tend to have issues running into walls
"I am among those who think that science has great beauty. A scientist in his laboratory is not only a technician: he is also a child placed before natural phenomena which impress him like a fairy tale." - Marie Curie
Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23
See resources I helped create here!
Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23
See resources I helped create here!
-
- Member
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Raw scores at nats predictions
No that was mainly based off of some Michigan teams being that high. I may have underestimated the top times, but I know a few teams will have conservative flights--at least for their first flight--to avoid hitting a wall at the higher torques.daydreamer0023 wrote:Is the 3:30 an estimate from Troy? I've heard they've got in that range.ScottMaurer19 wrote:1:~3:30
2-4: >3:10
5-6: >3:05
This may be a little high considering it's a racquetball court and teams tend to have issues running into walls
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n): Hydro: 3/5/18 Robot Arm: na/1/1 Rocks: 1/1/1 2018 (r/s/n): Heli: 2/1/7 Herp: 1/4/4 Mission: 1/1/6 Rocks: 1/1/1 Eco: 6/3/9 2019 (r/s/n): Fossils: 1/1/1 GLM: 1/1/1 Herp: 1/1/5 Mission: 1/1/3 WS: 4/1/10 Top 3 Medals: 144 Golds: 80
-
- Member
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2017 6:41 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Raw scores at nats predictions
The Michigan teams with those high scores didn't make it to Nationals.
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill
2019 Nationals:
Wright Stuff: 3rd
Protein Modeling: 4th
Geologic Mapping: 5th
2019 Nationals:
Wright Stuff: 3rd
Protein Modeling: 4th
Geologic Mapping: 5th
-
- Member
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2017 6:41 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Raw scores at nats predictions
Anyone getting over a 3:00 is doing great and has a chance to medal in my opinion 

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill
2019 Nationals:
Wright Stuff: 3rd
Protein Modeling: 4th
Geologic Mapping: 5th
2019 Nationals:
Wright Stuff: 3rd
Protein Modeling: 4th
Geologic Mapping: 5th
-
- Member
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Raw scores at nats predictions
This is true but it is an indicator that there are probably a handful of team who did make it to nats with times that high.sciencegirl03 wrote:The Michigan teams with those high scores didn't make it to Nationals.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n): Hydro: 3/5/18 Robot Arm: na/1/1 Rocks: 1/1/1 2018 (r/s/n): Heli: 2/1/7 Herp: 1/4/4 Mission: 1/1/6 Rocks: 1/1/1 Eco: 6/3/9 2019 (r/s/n): Fossils: 1/1/1 GLM: 1/1/1 Herp: 1/1/5 Mission: 1/1/3 WS: 4/1/10 Top 3 Medals: 144 Golds: 80
-
- Member
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 8:02 am
- Division: Grad
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Raw scores at nats predictions
What was the raw time for the national winner last year?ScottMaurer19 wrote:This is true but it is an indicator that there are probably a handful of team who did make it to nats with times that high.sciencegirl03 wrote:The Michigan teams with those high scores didn't make it to Nationals.
Deleted
-
- Member
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:44 pm
- Division: Grad
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Raw scores at nats predictions
It was around 2:20-2:30ish (can't remember exactly). However, that year didn't have a chinook bonus - and chinooks allow for a more stable copter if built correctly, in my opinion at least.DarthBuilder wrote:What was the raw time for the national winner last year?ScottMaurer19 wrote:This is true but it is an indicator that there are probably a handful of team who did make it to nats with times that high.sciencegirl03 wrote:The Michigan teams with those high scores didn't make it to Nationals.
"I am among those who think that science has great beauty. A scientist in his laboratory is not only a technician: he is also a child placed before natural phenomena which impress him like a fairy tale." - Marie Curie
Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23
See resources I helped create here!
Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23
See resources I helped create here!
-
- Member
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Raw scores at nats predictions
Larger rotors allow for longer times. Idk about stability but they are not as good about bouncing off of walls.daydreamer0023 wrote:It was around 2:20-2:30ish (can't remember exactly). However, that year didn't have a chinook bonus - and chinooks allow for a more stable copter if built correctly, in my opinion at least.DarthBuilder wrote:What was the raw time for the national winner last year?ScottMaurer19 wrote: This is true but it is an indicator that there are probably a handful of team who did make it to nats with times that high.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n): Hydro: 3/5/18 Robot Arm: na/1/1 Rocks: 1/1/1 2018 (r/s/n): Heli: 2/1/7 Herp: 1/4/4 Mission: 1/1/6 Rocks: 1/1/1 Eco: 6/3/9 2019 (r/s/n): Fossils: 1/1/1 GLM: 1/1/1 Herp: 1/1/5 Mission: 1/1/3 WS: 4/1/10 Top 3 Medals: 144 Golds: 80