Hovercraft B/C
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 176 times
- Been thanked: 752 times
Hovercraft B/C
Hovercraft Wiki, MagLev Wiki (similar)
Hovercraft Test Exchange 2018
Hovercraft Image Gallery, MagLev Image Gallery (similar)
Past Threads: 2011 (as MagLev C), 2012 (as MagLev C), 2013 (as MagLev C), 2014 (as MagLev C), 2017
Past Question Marathons: 2014 (as MagLev C), 2017
Hovercraft Test Exchange 2018
Hovercraft Image Gallery, MagLev Image Gallery (similar)
Past Threads: 2011 (as MagLev C), 2012 (as MagLev C), 2013 (as MagLev C), 2014 (as MagLev C), 2017
Past Question Marathons: 2014 (as MagLev C), 2017
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
- Member
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 6:36 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Paraphrased changes from last year
Completely new rule:
Graphs and/or tables relevant to relationship between time and distance are required, as well as a diagram or picture of the device. These graphs and tables will be used for scoring.
Rule changes:
Completely new rule:
Graphs and/or tables relevant to relationship between time and distance are required, as well as a diagram or picture of the device. These graphs and tables will be used for scoring.
Rule changes:
- Old: Device must have a length of 15.0-30.0 cm, a width less than 19.5 cm, and a height of less than 20.0 cm
New: Device must fit in a 40.0 cm x 40.0 cm x 40.0 box while levitated
- Old: Propeller shielding must block a 1/4" dowel from entering
New: Propeller shielding must block a 3/8" dowel from entering
- Old: Participants determine the mass of the vehicle prior to the competition, and this mass is used to calculate the mass score.
New: At the event, participants select between 0 and 16 rolls of pennies to load on their device. The 16 rolls are equal to about 2 kg. The number of penny rolls is used to calculate the mass score.
- Old: The track is set at 130.0 centimeters for Division B. In Division C, the event supervisor chooses a length between 100.0 and 195.0 cm
New: The track is set at 165.0 centimeters for Division B. In Division C, the event supervisor chooses a length between 165.0 and 260.0 cm
- Old: Event supervisors choose a target time between 5.0 s and 25.0 s
New: The target time is set at 15.0 s
- Old: Participants will be tested on history and theory of air cushioned vehicles
New: Air cushioned vehicles have been removed from the test
- Old: If teams miss impound, their mass score will be multiplied by 0.7
New: If teams impound their device, 3 points will be added to their final score.
- Old: Score Breakdown: 50% exam score, 25% mass score, 25% time score
New: Score Breakdown: 45% exam score, 21% mass score, 21% time score, 10% chart score, 3% impound bonus
-
- Member
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 6:36 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Oh, one more thing to note which really changes the event. Mass scores and time scores can come from different successful runs.
-
- Member
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 10:23 am
- Division: B
- State: AZ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Don't forget that the track width has changed from 20 cm to 60 cm.
Since the track is now much wider than the maximum hovercraft width some of the designs from last year to control the run time may no longer work.
Also the timing gates that we used last year won't work with the new track width.
Since the track is now much wider than the maximum hovercraft width some of the designs from last year to control the run time may no longer work.
Also the timing gates that we used last year won't work with the new track width.
-
- Member
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:50 pm
- Division: B
- State: WA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Nooo... my "tape a textbook into my notes binder so it doesn't fall out" strategy is a no-go this year! Slightly disappointed, but it's good to see that the rules committee thought to patch this loophole. Anyone else use this last year too?
EDIT: Realistically though, the textbook didn't help much at all in competition, since it takes so long to extract the needed information during a test.
EDIT: Realistically though, the textbook didn't help much at all in competition, since it takes so long to extract the needed information during a test.
Bottle Rockets: 5th Ecology: 9th Hovercraft: 14th Scrambler: 29th (with a failed run too ;))
Mousetrap Vehicle Hovercraft Ecology Experimental Design (or other inquiry :P) ...Yes, my profile picture is G2 apEX at the PGL Major Qual. :lol:
-
- Member
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:16 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Wasn't that the same last year?0ddrenaline wrote:Oh, one more thing to note which really changes the event. Mass scores and time scores can come from different successful runs.
Automated Event Assigner!
UMich 2018: Chem Lab, Fermi [url=http://tinyurl.com/kenniky-so-test]Rate my tests![/url]
[url]https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Kenniky[/url] [url=https://scioly.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=10008&start=34]2017 Nats = rip[/url] [url=https://youtu.be/MCo8IAovjfw]ABRHS 2016[/url]
-
- Member
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 6:36 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
This year, teams can do one run that has a high mass score but a bad time score. Then, they can remove the mass and shoot for a good time score. They can then use the best part of each. After reading the old rules, I don't believe that was allowed last year.kenniky wrote:Wasn't that the same last year?0ddrenaline wrote:Oh, one more thing to note which really changes the event. Mass scores and time scores can come from different successful runs.
-
- Member
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:16 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Is it not? Because we 100% did that at MIT0ddrenaline wrote:This year, teams can do one run that has a high mass score but a bad time score. Then, they can remove the mass and shoot for a good time score. They can then use the best part of each. After reading the old rules, I don't believe that was allowed last year.kenniky wrote:Wasn't that the same last year?0ddrenaline wrote:Oh, one more thing to note which really changes the event. Mass scores and time scores can come from different successful runs.
Automated Event Assigner!
UMich 2018: Chem Lab, Fermi [url=http://tinyurl.com/kenniky-so-test]Rate my tests![/url]
[url]https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Kenniky[/url] [url=https://scioly.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=10008&start=34]2017 Nats = rip[/url] [url=https://youtu.be/MCo8IAovjfw]ABRHS 2016[/url]
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 5:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
It seems that diodes are not allowed, so would that also apply to LEDs (could be useful for safety purposes)?
Rest in Peace Len Joeris
Acton-Boxborough Regional High School Captain 17-19
[b]2016 Air Trajectory Nationals - 3rd 2018 Hovercraft Nationals - 6th 2018 Mousetrap Nationals - 6th 2018 Nationals - Team 9th Place! 2019 Astronomy Nationals - 3rd! 2019 Nationals - Team 9th Place! [/b]
-
- Member
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 6:36 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
I guess it's vague. I stand by my position but I could be wrong. At least the intentions are very clear this year.kenniky wrote:Is it not? Because we 100% did that at MIT0ddrenaline wrote:This year, teams can do one run that has a high mass score but a bad time score. Then, they can remove the mass and shoot for a good time score. They can then use the best part of each. After reading the old rules, I don't believe that was allowed last year.kenniky wrote: Wasn't that the same last year?