Pictures, Videos, and Scores

baker
Member
Member
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:46 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by baker »

Balsa Man wrote:
baker wrote:[quote="Balsa ManNo pics at this point, but a quick set of numbers to consider, and check your numbers against:
From design calcs- for a tower weight of just over 8gr; legs fm 1.45 gr/36" at 3.26gr; ladders (using 1/4 bracing interval - 0.9gr/36" for lowest ladder, 0.8gr/36 for ones above it) at 1.71gr; Xs at 2.19gr (3/32nds" wide x 1/64th" thick, from 9.5 gr 3" x 36" sheet), and glue a bit under 1gr.
Now this sounds aggressive. I'm tempted to build this. Is this 'C' rules and bonus?
No, B rules w/ bonus. For C, aggressive, same weight estimating calc numbers are 8.7gr tower; 3.75gr legs (1.4gr/36"); 2.28 ladders, using 1/5 interval bracing- 1gr/36" for the lowest, 0.8gr/36 for higher ones, 1.6gr for Xs (1/16 x 1/64, from 7.5gr 3 x 36" sheet), and 1.1 gr glue[/quote]

What is the height for 'B'?
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Balsa Man »

baker wrote:
Balsa Man wrote:
baker wrote:[quote="Balsa ManNo pics at this point, but a quick set of numbers to consider, and check your numbers against:
From design calcs- for a tower weight of just over 8gr; legs fm 1.45 gr/36" at 3.26gr; ladders (using 1/4 bracing interval - 0.9gr/36" for lowest ladder, 0.8gr/36 for ones above it) at 1.71gr; Xs at 2.19gr (3/32nds" wide x 1/64th" thick, from 9.5 gr 3" x 36" sheet), and glue a bit under 1gr.
Now this sounds aggressive. I'm tempted to build this. Is this 'C' rules and bonus?
No, B rules w/ bonus. For C, aggressive, same weight estimating calc numbers are 8.7gr tower; 3.75gr legs (1.4gr/36"); 2.28 ladders, using 1/5 interval bracing- 1gr/36" for the lowest, 0.8gr/36 for higher ones, 1.6gr for Xs (1/16 x 1/64, from 7.5gr 3 x 36" sheet), and 1.1 gr glue
What is the height for 'B'?[/quote]

50cm (vs 60 for C)
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
embokim
Member
Member
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 3:17 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by embokim »

Thank you all for responding to me, love the feedback. yeah, when I tested my towers, they all broke by "exploding", pieces flying everywhere.I use one universal sized balsa, but recently ordered some smaller balsa from specializedbalsa. should arrive soon.
Happy to be here
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Balsa Man »

embokim wrote:Thank you all for responding to me, love the feedback. yeah, when I tested my towers, they all broke by "exploding", pieces flying everywhere.I use one universal sized balsa, but recently ordered some smaller balsa from specializedbalsa. should arrive soon.
Just fyi, I notice I didn't state size on legs and ladders in the stick weights I provided above- 1/8" x 1/8"
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
Iso_45678
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:20 pm
Division: B
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Iso_45678 »

I was wondering what a good score for Division B is. Most recently we have gotten around 200 without an attempt to the bonus. We are located in Illinois which has competitive tower teams and was wondering how to get a better score.
2016-17 Division B (British School of Chicago/Lisle/Wright State/Grayslake/Regionals/State)
Anatomy and Physiology (1/1/4/2/-/-) MISSING PARTNER AT GRAYSLAKE
Experimental Design (1/1/-/1/-/-)
Towers (1/3/-/12 :? /-/-)
User avatar
JojoCho
Member
Member
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:27 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by JojoCho »

Iso_45678 wrote:I was wondering what a good score for Division B is. Most recently we have gotten around 200 without an attempt to the bonus. We are located in Illinois which has competitive tower teams and was wondering how to get a better score.
Maybe try to post a picture of your tower first for tips and advice? How much did your tower weigh and how much did it hold? To be honest, right now a score of 200 is a bit low, competitive teams are getting scores of above 2000 and that's for Div. C, usually Div B scores should be higher. I suggest maybe looking at some other designs to reduce weight and increase your efficiency.
Last edited by JojoCho on Thu Jan 19, 2017 6:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Chattahoochee High School Class of 2019
University of Georgia Class of 2023
User Page
Orion66
Member
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:46 pm
Division: C
State: GA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Orion66 »

Iso_45678 wrote:I was wondering what a good score for Division B is. Most recently we have gotten around 200 without an attempt to the bonus. We are located in Illinois which has competitive tower teams and was wondering how to get a better score.
If you are looking for a better score:
Does your tower hold all the weight? If so, it is likely over-built, and too heavy to perform efficiently. Try reducing the thickness of the wood, amount of bracings, etc. to reduce the mass. After all, every kilogram that the tower holds above 15kg is more or less "wasted strength."

If it is a light tower, but breaking after holding very little mass, then consider, as JojoCho said, posting a picture.

But, unfortunately, 200 is a relatively low score for a Division B tower... No worries though! You have plenty of time to improve your tower and bring up its performance!
Chattahoochee High School

"Don't bother me. I'm busy conserving energy, momentum, and angular momentum"

2016: Bridges | Air Trajectory | Hydrogeology
2017: Towers | Helicopters | Hydrogeology
2018: Towers | Helicopters | Mousetrap Vehicle, Hovercraft
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Balsa Man »

I know it'll take a... significant time investment to go back to the beginning of all the threads here in the Towers forum, and read through everything; lots of threads, lots of pages, but if you do, you'll find and be able to pull together almost a text book on how to design and build a really good tower - scoring 1500 to 2000+; and there is lots of detail- exactly how to settle on a design, how to select wood that'll be light, and will work, how to build so it's precise, symmetrical, and will hold together at or near full load. That's a long way from where you're at right now. The best thing you can do right now to jump ahead is take the time to digest the info's that's been built up here. This is honestly the best/most important tip/recommendation anyone can give you at this point.

Yes, reducing wood (cross-sectional) size, and reducing wood density, and decreasing amount/weight of bracing, and decreasing glue weight will all help. But unless you have.....a correct understanding framework from which to figure out and understand those changes, you'll be shooting in the dark.

I encourage you to go for it, and hope you do, and can get to a much higher level
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
User avatar
NoahV
Member
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 6:15 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by NoahV »

Clueless Builder wrote:I'm C.

My newest tower held 15kg at 6.4g.



Could you post a picture of this design? Very Curious to see what it would look like.
Dohnnovan
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 11:18 pm
Division: B
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Dohnnovan »

For some reason, when i test my towers i get scores of around 1,100 yet when i take my towers to competitions they get scores of about 400-500.
Ukiah High School '20

Return to “Towers B/C”