Remote Sensing C
-
- Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 6:40 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Remote Sensing C
Yeah, there was a station with about 20 images taped to the desk, and there were about 35 options to choose from to describe the picture.TheGenius wrote:Well, I'm not sure what you've heard, but there were six stations, with 10 minutes to complete each. Each stations consisted of multiple choice and short answergneissisnice wrote:Yeah, I definitely wanna hear about the test.
I know the kids at Ward Melville who did it are very good at it (1st at States), but they ended up with 50th. I'm sure there's a hilarious story behind that, but I haven't heard it yet.
questions, some based on images taped on the desks, while others were general without context. If I recall correctly, there were stations on the properties of different materials (i.e. sand and ice), refraction of light through different mediums, image interpretation and matching (What the heck is El Nada?), wakes of ships travelling through water, GRACE (Station 3 I think), and something else that I don't remember.
The waves station was a joke.
There was also a secchi disk on there.
Harriton High School
-
- Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 6:40 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Remote Sensing C
That's exactly what it was like! But not even to the point where you could apply very much information from those events remote style.reesabp wrote:If you prepared for a RS test like everyone in the past, that test was sooooo off-base. It did not accurately reflect the rules. Fozendog and I were talking about how it was basically a Dynamic Planet Test + Water Quality + a hint of Satellites (the GRACE questions).
My partner and I prepared as well as the remote team from my school before us, and they got first place for the past two years while we got 26th with this test.
Harriton High School
-
- Member
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:28 pm
- Division: C
- State: NC
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Remote Sensing C
Pretty much. This was the first Remote Sensing test I have ever seen (and I have seen A LOT) that did not even mention Landsat or the A-Train. I could have thrown all of my note sheets and time spent studying out the window, and I would've done the same. It was simply NOT a Remote Sensing test. It seemed more like a unbalanced hodge podge of Earth Science and Physics with topics that either you knew, not because of having studied for Remote Sensing, or didn't.bwilby wrote:That's exactly what it was like! But not even to the point where you could apply very much information from those events remote style.reesabp wrote:If you prepared for a RS test like everyone in the past, that test was sooooo off-base. It did not accurately reflect the rules. Fozendog and I were talking about how it was basically a Dynamic Planet Test + Water Quality + a hint of Satellites (the GRACE questions).
My partner and I prepared as well as the remote team from my school before us, and they got first place for the past two years while we got 26th with this test.
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 5:31 pm
- Division: C
- State: WA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Remote Sensing C
Exactly. I feel as though this should be brought up to someone...idk who though...what do you all think?
-
- Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 6:40 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Remote Sensing C
Honestly it wouldn't do anything. It's just a dam shame that we all studied for an entire year for a test we never got to take.reesabp wrote:Exactly. I feel as though this should be brought up to someone...idk who though...what do you all think?
Last edited by bwilby on Mon May 20, 2013 7:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Harriton High School
-
- Member
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:06 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Remote Sensing C
I think you just did. Some of the "powers that be" read these boards.reesabp wrote:Exactly. I feel as though this should be brought up to someone...idk who though...what do you all think?
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:10 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Remote Sensing C
That's how I felt about Food Science at States when I was in 11th grade.bwilby wrote:Honestly it wouldn't do anything. It's just a dam shame that we all studied for an entire year for a test we never got to take.reesabp wrote:Exactly. I feel as though this should be brought up to someone...idk who though...what do you all think?
The event wasn't run at Regionals, and I had always done well in it the years before. I studied like crazy and learned everything about nutrition and biochemistry, including memorizing all of the amino acids, minerals, and vitamins and their effects on the body. At States, the entire test was pure chemistry, I felt like I had been tricked into taking a Chemistry Lab event. It was absolutely nothing that I prepared for and it barely fit the rules. I was so frustrated, we got 19th when I know I could have medalled if it was an actual Food Science event, I had studied so hard for an event that I didn't even get to take.
And I felt useless in the Remote Sensing test I took at Nats a few years ago because it also didn't follow the rules and was entirely satellites. None of my stuff was on it at all. Even though we medalled, by some miracle, I felt gypped that I didn't even get to take the event I studied for.
Edit: Said "Nationals" when I meant "Regionals". Oops.
Last edited by gneissisnice on Mon May 20, 2013 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
-
- Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 6:40 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Remote Sensing C
And now it's no longer an event, which is the cherry on top.gneissisnice wrote:That's how I felt about Food Science at States when I was in 11th grade.bwilby wrote:Honestly it wouldn't do anything. It's just a dam shame that we all studied for an entire year for a test we never got to take.reesabp wrote:Exactly. I feel as though this should be brought up to someone...idk who though...what do you all think?
The event wasn't run at Nationals, and I had always done well in it the years before. I studied like crazy and learned everything about nutrition and biochemistry, including memorizing all of the amino acids, minerals, and vitamins and their effects on the body. At States, the entire test was pure chemistry, I felt like I had been tricked into taking a Chemistry Lab event. It was absolutely nothing that I prepared for and it barely fit the rules. I was so frustrated, we got 19th when I know I could have medalled if it was an actual Food Science event, I had studied so hard for an event that I didn't even get to take.
And I felt useless in the Remote Sensing test I took at Nats a few years ago because it also didn't follow the rules and was entirely satellites. None of my stuff was on it at all. Even though we medalled, by some miracle, I felt gypped that I didn't even get to take the event I studied for.
Harriton High School