How come Mason, Centerville, and Mentor didn't compete? Was there another Ohio invite today?Private Wang Fire wrote:1. Solon (139)
2. Solon (145)
3. Fayetteville-Manlius (160)
4. Rustin (182)
5. Chardon (209)
6. Beachwood (265)
Solon looking reallly really good this year. 9 golds, 17 events with both teams placing. Wouldn't be surprised if they returned to the top 3 at nationals, especially with it being at Wright State in Ohio.
Also s/o to Beachwood for sliding into the top 6!
Ohio 2017
-
- Member
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 8:11 am
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Ohio 2017
Lower Merion Class Of 2017
-
- Member
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:03 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ohio 2017
I'm not sure about Centerville or Mason, but I'm pretty sure (not 100% but pretty sure) Mentor did compete. They just didn't include themselves in the scores since it's their own invitational.maxxxxx wrote: How come Mason, Centerville, and Mentor didn't compete? Was there another Ohio invite today?
-
- Member
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 3:43 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ohio 2017
Yup Solon does this at their invite as well. Speaking of Solon Invite, has anyone who attended gotten tests and keys yet?Ionizer wrote:I'm not sure about Centerville or Mason, but I'm pretty sure (not 100% but pretty sure) Mentor did compete. They just didn't include themselves in the scores since it's their own invitational.maxxxxx wrote: How come Mason, Centerville, and Mentor didn't compete? Was there another Ohio invite today?
We (Mason) didn't go because half our team has solo and ensemble and our coaches can't make it.
MASON HIGH SCHOOL '18
-
- Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 7:37 am
- Division: C
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ohio 2017
Hope S&E went well! We'd love to see you here next year!We (Mason) didn't go because half our team has solo and ensemble and our coaches can't make it.
Mentor Co-Captain 2016-2017
-
- Member
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 4:30 pm
- Division: C
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ohio 2017
Not sure what to think of Piqua's individual event award policy.
I'm not going to Piqua, but I think that this is an interesting modification. Anyone here going to Piqua this weekend?An additional modification from normal invitationals involves awarding medals for individual events. We are going to award the top 6 schools in each event with medals. For example, if your school has two teams and they finish 3rd and 4th overall, then your 3rd place team will be awarded the medals, and the 5th place team will be awarded 4th place medals. This is typically the practice for the overall invitational winners, we are just doing this for the individual awards as well. We are doing this in an attempt to have more schools called up during awards.
Herpetology / Ecology / Towers / Forensics / Microbe Mission
-
- Member
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:31 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Ohio 2017
So of all the strong ohio team thus far into the season, what is the predicted state final ranking?
1. Solon
2. ...?
1. Solon
2. ...?
NT '19
Harvard '23
Harvard '23
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 225 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Ohio 2017
1. SolonAshernoel wrote:So of all the strong ohio team thus far into the season, what is the predicted state final ranking?
1. Solon
2. ...?
2. Centerville
3. Mason
4. Mentor
5. Chardon
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 3201
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:32 am
- Division: Grad
- State: MD
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 204 times
Re: Ohio 2017
I actually think this is a good idea, in theory. It's always a good thing to give recognition to more schools, in my mind, as it can serve as a motivating factor to develop new programs. I do see the disadvantage in that some schools may have two teams finish top two in an event and only one will medal, but as long as this only happens at select tournaments, and doesn't become a global change, it'll be fine.smurphy00 wrote:Not sure what to think of Piqua's individual event award policy.
I'm not going to Piqua, but I think that this is an interesting modification. Anyone here going to Piqua this weekend?An additional modification from normal invitationals involves awarding medals for individual events. We are going to award the top 6 schools in each event with medals. For example, if your school has two teams and they finish 3rd and 4th overall, then your 3rd place team will be awarded the medals, and the 5th place team will be awarded 4th place medals. This is typically the practice for the overall invitational winners, we are just doing this for the individual awards as well. We are doing this in an attempt to have more schools called up during awards.
I pretty much agree with this exactly. My B ranks would probably look like:Unome wrote: 1. Solon
2. Centerville
3. Mason
4. Mentor
5. Chardon
1. Solon
2. Tower Heights
3. Magsig
4. Mentor Ridge
5. Watts
East Stroudsburg South Class of 2012, Alumnus of JT Lambert, Drexel University Class of 2017
Helpful Links
Wiki
Wiki Pages that Need Work
FAQ and SciOly FAQ Wiki
Chat (See IRC Wiki for more info)
BBCode Wiki
So long, and thanks for all the Future Dictator titles!
Helpful Links
Wiki
Wiki Pages that Need Work
FAQ and SciOly FAQ Wiki
Chat (See IRC Wiki for more info)
BBCode Wiki
So long, and thanks for all the Future Dictator titles!
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 225 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Ohio 2017
Potential discussion – correlation between the date of the Ohio state tournament and Ohio teams' results at Nationals
I don't think the correlation has much relevance, but hopefully there'll be some interesting discussion.
I don't think the correlation has much relevance, but hopefully there'll be some interesting discussion.