New York 2017

User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4315
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Re: New York 2017

Post by Unome »

CNYSciOlyGuy wrote:Mid State results are up: https://www.ezratech.us/competition/new ... 17/results
Is Cicero-North Syracuse still good? I didn't think they were good enough to beat out Jamesville-Dewitt or Camden (and since when has Chittenango been in Mid State?)
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
MakeFMSOGreatAgain
Member
Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2017 9:19 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: New York 2017

Post by MakeFMSOGreatAgain »

Unome wrote:
CNYSciOlyGuy wrote:Mid State results are up: https://www.ezratech.us/competition/new ... 17/results
Is Cicero-North Syracuse still good? I didn't think they were good enough to beat out Jamesville-Dewitt or Camden (and since when has Chittenango been in Mid State?)
C-NS has been decent recently but 2-5 is usually pretty close in MidState. As for Chittenango I think they were there last year but I'm not 100% sure
CNYSciOlyGuy
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:25 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: New York 2017

Post by CNYSciOlyGuy »

Do you think Fayetteville-Manlius has a chance this year? From what I've seen they didn't look good at MIT but they seemed much improved at regionals.
2017:
MIT/Mentor/UPenn/Regionals/States/Nats?
MatSci: 11/1/18/1/-/-
Remote: 18/3/7/1/-/-
Towers: 34 (don't break it the night before competition)/7/3/2/-/-
Fermi: 4/-/-/1/-/-
oscillatic
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 3:28 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: New York 2017

Post by oscillatic »

"However, there are lots of stories of other teams that use teams of different compositions at different tournaments to get different people experience. Harriton, for one, sometimes does this, and I'm sure other teams do it."

Nice if that were the goal but generally it is to identify the strongest students for each event to bolster scores. So some schools reconfigure that team for each competition. It's allowable but has always seemed to me to be out of keeping with the spirit of Science Olympiad.
User avatar
EastStroudsburg13
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 3201
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:32 am
Division: Grad
State: MD
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 204 times

Re: New York 2017

Post by EastStroudsburg13 »

oscillatic wrote:"However, there are lots of stories of other teams that use teams of different compositions at different tournaments to get different people experience. Harriton, for one, sometimes does this, and I'm sure other teams do it."

Nice if that were the goal but generally it is to identify the strongest students for each event to bolster scores. So some schools reconfigure that team for each competition. It's allowable but has always seemed to me to be out of keeping with the spirit of Science Olympiad.
The goal is to perform as well as possible at regionals, states, and nationals. The goal at invitationals is to prepare for regionals, states, and nationals. Is reconfiguring teams to figure out the optimal composition of a team, and to give younger members experience with older teammates so that they can succeed in future years, not in keeping with this goal?
East Stroudsburg South Class of 2012, Alumnus of JT Lambert, Drexel University Class of 2017

Helpful Links
Wiki
Wiki Pages that Need Work
FAQ and SciOly FAQ Wiki
Chat (See IRC Wiki for more info)
BBCode Wiki


So long, and thanks for all the Future Dictator titles!
GoldenKnight1
Coach
Coach
Posts: 224
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: New York 2017

Post by GoldenKnight1 »

EastStroudsburg13 wrote:
oscillatic wrote:"However, there are lots of stories of other teams that use teams of different compositions at different tournaments to get different people experience. Harriton, for one, sometimes does this, and I'm sure other teams do it."

Nice if that were the goal but generally it is to identify the strongest students for each event to bolster scores. So some schools reconfigure that team for each competition. It's allowable but has always seemed to me to be out of keeping with the spirit of Science Olympiad.
The goal is to perform as well as possible at regionals, states, and nationals. The goal at invitationals is to prepare for regionals, states, and nationals. Is reconfiguring teams to figure out the optimal composition of a team, and to give younger members experience with older teammates so that they can succeed in future years, not in keeping with this goal?
The logistics are some of the hardest part for our team to have the same combinations all the time. Many invitationals we attend have unique schedules and regional, state, and nationals don't match up. Additionally team members having non-SO activities that conflict with some invitationals become an issue that require moving people around.

Also sometimes people drop off as the season go on or others really start to shine.
chaguy2457
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 7:53 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: New York 2017

Post by chaguy2457 »

The following teams from the New York City-Metro region just qualified for the States tournament:

1st Place: Townsend Harris
2nd Place: Brooklyn Technical
3rd Place: Stuyvesant
4th Place: Collegiate School
5th Place: Staten Island Technical
6th Place: Poly Prep Country Day
7th Place: Leon M. Goldstein
Captain

Bold indicates main event
2016 Events: Disease Detectives, Dynamic Planet, Forensics, Fossils, Game On, Green Generation, It's About Time
Medal Count: 3

2017 Events: Experimental Design, Game On, Hovercraft, Rocks and Minerals, Herpetology, Wind Power
Medal Count: 3
Piggy
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2015 11:43 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: New York 2017

Post by Piggy »

Nassau West Regionals Results
Ran 25 events, dropped 3 events

1. Great Neck South A (69)
2. Kellenberg A (120)
3. Chaminade A (131)
4. Roslyn A (143)
5. Schreiber (148)
6. Great Neck South C (155)
7. Horace Mann A (161)
8. Great Neck South B (202)
9. Great Neck North A (207)
10. Manhasset C (236)

Teams qualifying for states:
GNS A, Kellenberg A, Chaminade A, Roslyn A, Schreiber
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4315
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Re: New York 2017

Post by Unome »

Piggy wrote:Nassau West Regionals Results
Ran 25 events, dropped 3 events

1. Great Neck South A (69)
2. Kellenberg A (120)
3. Chaminade A (131)
4. Roslyn A (143)
5. Schreiber (148)
6. Great Neck South C (155)
7. Horace Mann A (161)
8. Great Neck South B (202)
9. Great Neck North A (207)
10. Manhasset C (236)

Teams qualifying for states:
GNS A, Kellenberg A, Chaminade A, Roslyn A, Schreiber
Quite a gap. Didn't Kellenberg beat you guys two years ago?
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
User avatar
JasperKota
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 8:01 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: New York 2017

Post by JasperKota »

Lake Erie/Niagara qualifying results:
1. Williamsville East HS
2. St. Joseph
3. Lancaster HS
4. Nichols
5. Williamsville North HS

EDIT: Apologies I was misinformed.
Last edited by JasperKota on Mon Feb 06, 2017 8:06 am, edited 3 times in total.
2020 Events: Fossils, Gravity Vehicle, Wright Stuff, Ping Pong Parachute
2019 Events: Fossils, Mousetrap Vehicle, Wright Stuff
2018 Events: Helicopters, Mousetrap Vehicle, Parasitology, WIDI
2017 Events: Ecology, Invasives, Wright Stuff
2016 Events: Crave the Wave, Dynamic Planet, Invasives

Return to “2017 Invitationals, Regionals, and States”