Page 5 of 10

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 9th, 2009, 2:03 pm
by Pleiades
my team calls them the regular team and the alternate teams. We have a regular team and 2 alternate teams for a total of 3 teams. I guess that's different though because the alternate teams compete in a different tier than the regular teams.

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 9th, 2009, 4:16 pm
by oceangirl.007
:o
Our schools only have one team...the competition team.
In middle school, we had some small club called the 6th grade team and school team...but they didn't really do anything (or they don't really get that much attention).
In HS, there is only one team, and the 5 alternates.

O yea, I forgot to add what events I am doing this year.
I do Cell Biology, Dynamic Planet, and Picture This. (Basically, I am a studier, not a builder =P)

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 9th, 2009, 4:58 pm
by EastStroudsburg13
Yeah, similar here. I think it's better because the members have to be better because there's more competition. Just my opinion though.

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 9th, 2009, 5:36 pm
by sciolykid101
oceangirl.007 wrote::o
Our schools only have one team...the competition team.
In middle school, we had some small club called the 6th grade team and school team...but they didn't really do anything (or they don't really get that much attention).
In HS, there is only one team, and the 5 alternates.

O yea, I forgot to add what event I am doing this year.
I do Cell Biology, Dynamic Planet, and Picture This. (Basically, I am a studier, not a builder =P)
Okay. So, are you on the competition team?

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 10th, 2009, 7:21 am
by oceangirl.007
Yes.

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 10th, 2009, 1:34 pm
by sciolykid101
oceangirl.007 wrote:Yes.
Wow, you are only a 9th grader/10th grader and you are on the team.

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 10th, 2009, 4:35 pm
by EastStroudsburg13
I guess that may be amazing for you, but we have 7 freshman on our competition team (Including me! :D ). We don't really have the numbers to pick and choose, but this year I don't think it'll make much of a difference for us.

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 13th, 2009, 3:42 pm
by sciolykid101
Well, my team doesn't care about the freshmen. No matter how much they are better than the upperclassmen. Some upperclassmen are really annoying and cocky.

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 14th, 2009, 5:38 pm
by robotman
i think my team has a good chance to go to Nats this year

Re: Nationals Results

Posted: February 15th, 2009, 5:35 pm
by andrewwski
sciolykid101 wrote:Well, my team doesn't care about the freshmen. No matter how much they are better than the upperclassmen. Some upperclassmen are really annoying and butterfly.
Oh, and there's no such thing as annoying freshmen, right?

I'm sure there's freshmen that are indeed more qualified than some upperclassmen. I know there are. But in most cases an upperclassman is going to get the first shot.

As a senior and the president this year, this was my criteria:

1.) Effort. If someone's not showing effort, they don't deserve it. I do feel we could have done better in this department, as some people didn't end up putting in the time. The thought certainly crossed my mind of making a few last-minute swaps.

2.) Experience. If you've been on the team before, the experience is invaluable. Especially if you've done the event.

3.) Knowledge in subject area. The people competing in each event need to have a good understanding of what they're doing.

One thing about being a junior/senior is that you've taken a lot more classes in the subject area. I wouldn't put a freshman in Chem Lab or Physics Lab, as they haven't taken Chem or Physics. Someone who's taken AP Bio is going to be better qualified for Cell Bio or Health Science than someone new.

Since there's two people in each event, often there's a combination of upperclassmen and underclassmen in each event. This usually works out well, as it's better preparation for years to come.

This year we had 3 seniors, 2 juniors, 6 sophomores, and 4 freshmen. We did not have a lot of upperclassmen interest...the two juniors and one senior were new this year, one of the seniors had only one year of experience.

But the fact remains that in many cases the upperclassmen are better suited. You can't expect to necessarily make the team your first year...but if you show an effort, you'll be better prepared for the next year.

Now, there are some incredibly talented freshmen. I worked with some this year and they did outstanding. Our freshmen on our team did better than most of the rest of the team. One reason for that is they were in the events that they could best apply their talents, and they showed more effort than I've ever seen. There were also a lot more freshmen that I wish could have fit on the team, because never before have I seen such enthusiasm. They'll definitely do well in the years to come.