Towers B/C

Clueless Builder
Member
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 6:40 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Clueless Builder »

So about a 25-35% decrease? Thanks for your insight. I have finished my first (crummy) tower, but will post back here when I test it. I'm not nationals material, but hopefully I can help to get a benchmark for people!
IvySpear
Member
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:38 pm
Division: C
State: NC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Towers B/C

Post by IvySpear »

How do you guys recommending setting up a testing rig at home? Not too sure on exactly how to do it. Also, could you guys mention where you buy the 5 by 5 block, screws, etc.? Thanks
Self-actualization is an irony, for when you achieve it, you realize you have not achieved it.
retired1
Member
Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:04 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Towers B/C

Post by retired1 »

5 cm is extremely close to 2". so just cut a 2 x 2 square and drill a hole to pass the 1/4" eyebolt. A 2 " long piece of a 1 x 2 piece of lumber is a bit less than 2", but for testing purposes it would work fine as long as the top of your tower was less that that.
You get the hardware at a big box store. Talk nice and they may give you a 2" long piece of a 1x4.
What do you plan on using for your test table?
Clueless Builder
Member
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 6:40 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Clueless Builder »

Well I have a 3D printer so I just printed mine. I could share the STL if you don't know how to make a square with a hole in it.
jander14indoor
Member
Member
Posts: 1638
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:54 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by jander14indoor »

I can't speak to your 3D printer, but most consumer grade ones I've seen tend to leave textured surfaces. Be careful with that.
Most tournament test surfaces I've seen are fairly slick, smooth melamine or similar. Your tower will behave VERY different on a smooth, slick surface than a rough high drag one.

Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 738 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by bernard »

IvySpear wrote:How do you guys recommending setting up a testing rig at home? Not too sure on exactly how to do it. Also, could you guys mention where you buy the 5 by 5 block, screws, etc.? Thanks
Pitsco sells a test block for Boomilever, which uses the same block as Towers: http://www.pitsco.com/Precision_Test_Block_Boomilever. A Test Base can be made from a thick sheet of wood. Draw the 20 cm x 20 cm square, drill a hole large enough for a jig saw blade, and use the jig saw to remove unwanted material. If your school has a wood shop, see if its manager is willing to cut it for you; the cutting is very quick and can be done in 3 minutes.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
Clueless Builder
Member
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 6:40 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Clueless Builder »

What is the reason for this difference between textured and slick? Would the loading block slide off of the tower?

And also almost all prints created with heated beds will have fairly slick undersides.
JonB
Coach
Coach
Posts: 343
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:00 pm
Division: C
State: FL
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by JonB »

Clueless Builder wrote:Well I have a 3D printer so I just printed mine. I could share the STL if you don't know how to make a square with a hole in it.
Are you referring to your loading block (top of tower) or your testing base (the surface your tower is on)? 3D printed loading block is good (no matter if it's rough or smooth) but I am not sure why you would print a test base. Can you clarify?
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4315
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 217 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Unome »

JonB wrote:
Clueless Builder wrote:Well I have a 3D printer so I just printed mine. I could share the STL if you don't know how to make a square with a hole in it.
Are you referring to your loading block (top of tower) or your testing base (the surface your tower is on)? 3D printed loading block is good (no matter if it's rough or smooth) but I am not sure why you would print a test base. Can you clarify?
Was wondering about the test base; in my experience very few 3D printers are large enough for that (plus it would take a few days to print and be strong enough to support the load).
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 738 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by bernard »

Clueless Builder wrote:What is the reason for this difference between textured and slick? Would the loading block slide off of the tower?

And also almost all prints created with heated beds will have fairly slick undersides.
Sounds like Jeff is talking about printing Test Bases. Slick Loading Block Assemblies and Test Bases can surprise you if you've tested using setups that have friction. On a rough surface, the roughness allows friction to hold some things in place.

I second JonB's comment that printing Test Bases is not a good idea. Extruding layers rather than casting an entire piece produces a weaker product that can more easily break between layers.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs

Return to “Towers B/C”