motor specs? brand?Ed63 wrote:3000mah 7.2V NiMH battery, DC brushed motor, belt driven gear set. We originally had a faster motor but didn't have enough traction to use it. Kept spinning out.
You can definitely get enough speed with a brushed motor setup.
Electric Vehicle C
-
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1382
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Electric Vehicle C
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 5:47 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
LiFePO4 cells are 3.3V nominal and charge to 3.6V.
“Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud.” —Sophocles
If you are looking to give help or get help:
[wiki][/wiki] > Forum post > > PM > Email
Don't forget the Image Gallery, the , and the list of Exalted User medals.
[wiki][/wiki] > Forum post > > PM > Email
Don't forget the Image Gallery, the , and the list of Exalted User medals.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:10 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
Are we allowed to have the car go backwards right when it is activated and then start going forward like 2 meters behind the starting line? I don't see any rule against it but not sure if that would be 'in the spirit of the competition'.
Innovation =/= success
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Electric Vehicle C
I think this FAQ relates: https://www.soinc.org/node/1664Bazinga+ wrote:Are we allowed to have the car go backwards right when it is activated and then start going forward like 2 meters behind the starting line? I don't see any rule against it but not sure if that would be 'in the spirit of the competition'.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1382
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Electric Vehicle C
No, I believe what Bazinga+ is referring to is not crossing the first photogate at the beginning and instead of moving forward, back the vehicle up a bit (for example 2 meters backwards from the starting line) and then accelerating so that he has more room to accelerate rather than the given 0.5 meters to the first photogate.chalker wrote:I think this FAQ relates: https://www.soinc.org/node/1664Bazinga+ wrote:Are we allowed to have the car go backwards right when it is activated and then start going forward like 2 meters behind the starting line? I don't see any rule against it but not sure if that would be 'in the spirit of the competition'.
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Electric Vehicle C
I understand exactly what the question was, hence my statement that that FAQ 'relates' to it. The FAQ says it's ok to stop and reverse at the end of the run, thus some assumptions could be made that same applies at the beginning of a run.windu34 wrote:No, I believe what Bazinga+ is referring to is not crossing the first photogate at the beginning and instead of moving forward, back the vehicle up a bit (for example 2 meters backwards from the starting line) and then accelerating so that he has more room to accelerate rather than the given 0.5 meters to the first photogate.chalker wrote:I think this FAQ relates: https://www.soinc.org/node/1664Bazinga+ wrote:Are we allowed to have the car go backwards right when it is activated and then start going forward like 2 meters behind the starting line? I don't see any rule against it but not sure if that would be 'in the spirit of the competition'.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Coach
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 5:02 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Electric Vehicle C
First, I love the idea.Bazinga+ wrote:Are we allowed to have the car go backwards right when it is activated and then start going forward like 2 meters behind the starting line? I don't see any rule against it but not sure if that would be 'in the spirit of the competition'.
4.d. States "No part of the vehicle can be further than 1.00m behind the start line." Now I might make the argument that the intention of that rule was only to be at the moment of activation but that was not how it was written and there is no FAQ addressing it.
If it was allowed though be careful in your planning as you won't necessarily know how much space you will have behind the start line to do this.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:00 pm
- Division: C
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Electric Vehicle C
Bazinga+ wrote:Are we allowed to have the car go backwards right when it is activated and then start going forward like 2 meters behind the starting line? I don't see any rule against it but not sure if that would be 'in the spirit of the competition'.
This exact idea has been a hot topic of debate within our team. Some would read the rules and say "okay" and others "no" (some might state "spirit of the games" rule...). At the regional and state level I feel that you could get a run violation or something of the like because ES would not expect to see something like that. You could arbitrate but the outcome of that is such a variable. It is a gamble that might not be safe at many levels of competition. Honestly, I feel the safest place to do something like this is actually nationals being that they are expecting teams to find creative solutions to problems.
Of course, this is all just my opinion.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:10 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
Yeah that's what i was thinking. Do you think the track length for nationals will be announced? Like the furthest distance the car can go and the furthest back it can go.JonB wrote:Bazinga+ wrote:Are we allowed to have the car go backwards right when it is activated and then start going forward like 2 meters behind the starting line? I don't see any rule against it but not sure if that would be 'in the spirit of the competition'.
This exact idea has been a hot topic of debate within our team. Some would read the rules and say "okay" and others "no" (some might state "spirit of the games" rule...). At the regional and state level I feel that you could get a run violation or something of the like because ES would not expect to see something like that. You could arbitrate but the outcome of that is such a variable. It is a gamble that might not be safe at many levels of competition. Honestly, I feel the safest place to do something like this is actually nationals being that they are expecting teams to find creative solutions to problems.
Of course, this is all just my opinion.
Innovation =/= success
-
- Coach
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:00 pm
- Division: C
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Electric Vehicle C
Bazinga+ wrote:Yeah that's what i was thinking. Do you think the track length for nationals will be announced? Like the furthest distance the car can go and the furthest back it can go.JonB wrote:Bazinga+ wrote:Are we allowed to have the car go backwards right when it is activated and then start going forward like 2 meters behind the starting line? I don't see any rule against it but not sure if that would be 'in the spirit of the competition'.
This exact idea has been a hot topic of debate within our team. Some would read the rules and say "okay" and others "no" (some might state "spirit of the games" rule...). At the regional and state level I feel that you could get a run violation or something of the like because ES would not expect to see something like that. You could arbitrate but the outcome of that is such a variable. It is a gamble that might not be safe at many levels of competition. Honestly, I feel the safest place to do something like this is actually nationals being that they are expecting teams to find creative solutions to problems.
Of course, this is all just my opinion.
I do not think it will- especially after this conversation. haha