I agree the ETS probably won't count without the second golf ball. Also, the final task might not count with this set-up. It seems the last golf ball must trigger a switch and the switch activates a buzzer with nothing else between the switch and the buzzer. This is just my opinion, but my opinions have been over-ruled a lot this year. Submitting an FAQ might be good idea.ScienceNerd27 wrote:
The reason we added the flashlight and photocells in between the switch the golf ball hits and the buzzer was we were trying to include another bonus sequence but I don't want to get the points for that and lose the points for the final task. Do you guys think this is acceptable per the rules or something that needs changed?
Meaning of Rules
-
- Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:09 am
- Division: B
- State: KY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Meaning of Rules
-
- Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Meaning of Rules
I thought I read that there was a limit on the number of motors we could use but now I can't find it in the rules. So is there a limit or did I imagine reading this????
-
- Member
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:53 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MD
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Meaning of Rules
There was a limit in the original rules for 2014, but not this year (2015)ScienceNerd27 wrote:I thought I read that there was a limit on the number of motors we could use but now I can't find it in the rules. So is there a limit or did I imagine reading this????
Re: Meaning of Rules
What counts as a "Unique ETS"?
Are "M - E - M - M" and "M - E - M - M - M" unique?
I think this depends on the definition of "transfer" in the rules. Does it mean a change from one energy type to a different one? Or just a transfer of energy (A ball colliding with another ball "transfers" its Kinetic Energy to the 2nd ball).
I'm ASSUMING they mean the former definition, where the transfer must involve a CHANGE of type of energy, since this is what counted for points last year (M -> M was just counted as a duplicate and ignored last year). If we use this definition, I would say those two ETS's above are NOT unique, since, without the duplicate M->M's, they are both "M-E-M".
Any thoughts?
Are "M - E - M - M" and "M - E - M - M - M" unique?
I think this depends on the definition of "transfer" in the rules. Does it mean a change from one energy type to a different one? Or just a transfer of energy (A ball colliding with another ball "transfers" its Kinetic Energy to the 2nd ball).
I'm ASSUMING they mean the former definition, where the transfer must involve a CHANGE of type of energy, since this is what counted for points last year (M -> M was just counted as a duplicate and ignored last year). If we use this definition, I would say those two ETS's above are NOT unique, since, without the duplicate M->M's, they are both "M-E-M".
Any thoughts?
-
- Member
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:39 am
- Division: Grad
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Meaning of Rules
I agree with your interpretation of the rules, based on the phrase "has a sequence of 2 or more transfers from one Energy Form to a different Energy Form"
Proud member of the Liberal Arts and Science Academy team, 2012-2015