Astronomy C

hippo9
Member
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:35 am
Division: C
State: IN
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by hippo9 »

syo_astro wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:51 pm
hippo9 wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:29 pm So for calculating recessional velocity from redshift I've found 2 different equations:

The far simpler z=v/c
As well as the more complicated (v/c)= ((z+1)^2-1)/((z+1^2+1)
Sorry that looks bad.

Which one is correct then? Or are they for different situations that I'm oblivious to?
Yup, they're used in different situations! The simpler form is used at "low" velocities (specifically: non-relativistic), while the other form is more general (called "relativistic Doppler shift"). hippo9 also asked on chat why on some people use "z=v/c" vs. "z=~v/c" (implying the equality exact or approximate). I think if people use "=", they are saying it's an approximation but "basically the same", so it's fair to say that "=". Need a more detailed proof, or does that suffice? Practically speaking, you just have to be on lookout for whether something is explicitly or implicitly stated to be at relativistic speeds.
Ok cool thanks, just look out for the diction I guess.
2018: Battery Buggy, Road Scholar, Roller Coaster
2019: Chem Lab, Code, Disease, Fossils, Geo Maps, Sounds
2020 and 2021: Astro, Chem Lab, Code, Fossils, Geo Maps, Sounds

When you miss nats twice by a combined two points :|
User avatar
Blank25
Member
Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:34 pm
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Blank25 »

What's the best way to split up studying between partners? Or should me and my partner not split up the work?
2020 Events: Astronomy, Ornithology, Water Quality, Protein Modeling
2019 Events: Fermi, Protein Modeling, Mission Possible
2018 Events: Dynamic Planet, Herpetology, Towers, Disease Detectives, Forensics, Parasitology
2017 Events: Ecology, Invasives, Hovercraft, Towers, Astronomy
User avatar
Name
Member
Member
Posts: 434
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:41 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 46 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Name »

Blank25 wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:49 pm What's the best way to split up studying between partners? Or should me and my partner not split up the work?
Because it's almost impossible to solo an astro test prob split it. I've personally found it best to split math stuff and DSO stuff. You should still have a good understanding of the other section though.
South Woods MS, Syosset HS '21
BirdSO TD/ES
Past Events: Microbe, Invasive, Matsci, Fermi, Astro, Code, Fossils
1st place MIT Codebusters 2019-2020
1st place NYS Fermi Questions (2019), Astronomy and Codebusters (2021)
Science Olympiad Founder's Scholarship winner
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by PM2017 »

Name wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:01 pm
Blank25 wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:49 pm What's the best way to split up studying between partners? Or should me and my partner not split up the work?
Because it's almost impossible to solo an astro test prob split it. I've personally found it best to split math stuff and DSO stuff. You should still have a good understanding of the other section though.
I'd say the above is definitely true for during the test itself (worked well for us, anyways).

Just be wary that sometimes tests are disproportionately weighted towards one side or another, so like Name said, make sure to be well-versed in the other topic as well. When my partner and I studied and made notes we both worked on both sections.
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
dkarkada
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:37 am
Division: Grad
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Astronomy C

Post by dkarkada »

Hi everyone! I've put up my astro exam for UT invite here. Hope this is helpful! Let me know by email if you have any questions.
User avatar
Adi1008
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 1:56 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 150 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Adi1008 »

Just wanted to let y'all know that the webinars for this year went up a couple of weeks ago! You can find them here.
Stanford University
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
kalimarieyork
Member
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2019 9:48 am
Division: C
State: UT
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Astronomy C

Post by kalimarieyork »

So what's the focus for 2019-2020 season?
pb5754
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:49 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by pb5754 »

kalimarieyork wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 10:08 am So what's the focus for 2019-2020 season?
stellar/galactic formation/evolution
West Windsor-Plainsboro High School South '21
2021 Nationals: Astronomy - 1st, Geologic Mapping - 1st, Team - 6th
Waterpigcow
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 7:02 pm
Division: C
State: NC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Waterpigcow »

Is it a worthwhile investment to write programs on my ti-84/laptop to quickly solve math sections? my astronomy team does decent at dso questions and stellar evolution/conceptual stuff but we struggle with the math every year. I figure using the formula sheet on the wiki i could write a bunch of programs to solve for that stuff. would it be better if we actually learned the math or would a couple programs be enough? I'm pretty sure i could write the programs in less time to learn the math as well and since everyone on the team is busy i feel like it'd be a more efficient use of time.
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4315
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Unome »

Waterpigcow wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:03 pm Is it a worthwhile investment to write programs on my ti-84/laptop to quickly solve math sections? my astronomy team does decent at dso questions and stellar evolution/conceptual stuff but we struggle with the math every year. I figure using the formula sheet on the wiki i could write a bunch of programs to solve for that stuff. would it be better if we actually learned the math or would a couple programs be enough? I'm pretty sure i could write the programs in less time to learn the math as well and since everyone on the team is busy i feel like it'd be a more efficient use of time.
It's more important to know how they work. After that, I would say go ahead and write a program.
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.

Return to “2020 Study Events”