Page 2 of 8
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 4th, 2020, 4:13 pm
by xiangyu
Godspeed wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 3:56 pm
xiangyu wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 1:49 pm
Godspeed wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 11:39 am
I've been getting some very very good scores, which is obviously good for me, but sometimes they're just unrealistic, as in the fact that I've gotten over 12,000 once.
You sure that wasn't a bug? They fixed a bug Friday morning. I've gotten 75000 before lol
I don't actually think it was a bug. I've experienced the bug myself, and this wasn't it. It was a very strange design.
Interesting. Under nomal year dimensions? Congrats!
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 4th, 2020, 9:06 pm
by Godspeed
xiangyu wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 4:13 pm
Godspeed wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 3:56 pm
xiangyu wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 1:49 pm
You sure that wasn't a bug? They fixed a bug Friday morning. I've gotten 75000 before lol
I don't actually think it was a bug. I've experienced the bug myself, and this wasn't it. It was a very strange design.
Interesting. Under nomal year dimensions? Congrats!
Oh nah mate under the lowest dimensions, 20 cm loading distance and 3 cm contact width lines lmaooo.
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 5th, 2020, 7:42 pm
by xiangyu
Godspeed wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 9:06 pm
xiangyu wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 4:13 pm
Godspeed wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 3:56 pm
I don't actually think it was a bug. I've experienced the bug myself, and this wasn't it. It was a very strange design.
Interesting. Under nomal year dimensions? Congrats!
Oh nah mate under the lowest dimensions, 20 cm loading distance and 3 cm contact width lines lmaooo.
Oh LOL, that makes more sense haha
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 5th, 2020, 9:20 pm
by Godspeed
xiangyu wrote: ↑October 5th, 2020, 7:42 pm
Godspeed wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 9:06 pm
xiangyu wrote: ↑October 4th, 2020, 4:13 pm
Interesting. Under nomal year dimensions? Congrats!
Oh nah mate under the lowest dimensions, 20 cm loading distance and 3 cm contact width lines lmaooo.
Oh LOL, that makes more sense haha
Yeah... my device is still performing pretty similarly, just not that insanely well.
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 7th, 2020, 4:59 am
by sciolyperson1
What's a reasonable score for worst case (400, 70)/ best case (200, 30) scenario? I've heard a guy claiming "3000+" at (400, 70) and other similarly unreasonable claims...
edit: im a clown
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 7th, 2020, 5:21 am
by sneepity
sciolyperson1 wrote: ↑October 7th, 2020, 4:59 am
What's a reasonable score for worst case (400, 70)/ best case (200, 30) scenario? I've heard a guy claiming "3000+" at (400, 70) and other similarly unreasonable claims...
Is that the distance from the wall/contact width? If so, I think he may be lying or not lying,depends on how much he tested it,and the specs he used.
You could try and use a ratio to compare those specs to a standard boomi's specs-
400/70 and 40/8 I think
40/7 is the simplified ratio, whose contact width is one centimeter off (which depends on how far apart the guy placed it).
We had scores (at least in div b) getting somewhat close to 3k, and if he's in div C, I think it may be possible.
:/I hope I helped! I may or may not have used the correct math, by deflating the version by using ratios, so correct me if I'm wrong.
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 7th, 2020, 8:15 pm
by Godspeed
sneepity wrote: ↑October 7th, 2020, 5:21 am
sciolyperson1 wrote: ↑October 7th, 2020, 4:59 am
What's a reasonable score for worst case (400, 70)/ best case (200, 30) scenario? I've heard a guy claiming "3000+" at (400, 70) and other similarly unreasonable claims...
Is that the distance from the wall/contact width? If so, I think he may be lying or not lying,depends on how much he tested it,and the specs he used.
You could try and use a ratio to compare those specs to a standard boomi's specs-
400/70 and 40/8 I think
40/7 is the simplified ratio, whose contact width is one centimeter off (which depends on how far apart the guy placed it).
We had scores (at least in div b) getting somewhat close to 3k, and if he's in div C, I think it may be possible.
:/I hope I helped! I may or may not have used the correct math, by deflating the version by using ratios, so correct me if I'm wrong.
That man is capping. I was getting 3000 before area loads were introduced, but ever since area loads became introduced, my scores dropped significantly. I'm wondering what your best scores are for 40,7 and 20,3. Also if iirc, the worst case scenario is 45,7 and not 40,7
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 9th, 2020, 3:22 pm
by Godspeed
For minimum loading distance, are section dimensions included?
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 9th, 2020, 6:43 pm
by bernard
Godspeed wrote: ↑October 9th, 2020, 3:22 pm
For minimum loading distance, are section dimensions included?
If I'm not mistaken by your question, the Area Load is defined by four nodes which have no section dimension. Therefore the Minimum Loading Distance should be the distance between the node closest to the Testing Wall involved in an Area Load and the Testing Wall.
Re: Digital Structures B/C [mini SO, Satellite SO]
Posted: October 17th, 2020, 1:51 pm
by nocommonsense
Does anyone know what the minimum and and maximum length for the structure we have to build for the competition? Thanks.