Mission Possible C

User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4315
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 219 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by Unome »

cuber wrote:Do you guys think it might be better to go with a box style frame with 3 walls, or a singular standing wall? or maybe just freestanding with a base? It seems like size matter less, only counting for a tiebreaker, so I am considering not making much of an effort to minimize my design.
Oh, size is only a tiebreaker? Seems I should have read the rules more closely...

I'd think a two-walled box would be good enough, unless you can easily remove one of the walls for maintenance (in which case I'd say three sounds fine).
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
0ddrenaline
Member
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 6:36 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by 0ddrenaline »

Rule 5.h definitely says that points are awarded for a smaller device size.

However, size is also a tiebreaker.
User avatar
cuber
Member
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 7:26 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by cuber »

oops. I was the one who misread. seems to be the standard point per cm undersized. I think a removable wall might be the way to go, more dense packing while keeping maintenance easy.
jrales
Member
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 5:53 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by jrales »

Do you think it is better to go about this event by designing the start and finish, then adding each mechanism and figuring out how to transition them one at a time, or planning it all at once leaving less room for change and improvement but optimizing every step before hand?
User avatar
dragonfruit35
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:49 am
Division: Grad
State: VA
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by dragonfruit35 »

jrales wrote:Do you think it is better to go about this event by designing the start and finish, then adding each mechanism and figuring out how to transition them one at a time, or planning it all at once leaving less room for change and improvement but optimizing every step before hand?
Well, you should definitely have an idea of what your start and finish tasks are before you begin. In my opinion, it's best to at least attempt to plan out all your tasks. If you end up wanting to add to or modify your machine (you will), you'll have a jumping-off point.
tjhsst '20
virginia tech '24
2x codebusters national medalist

"it's not a pen, it's a principle!" - annie edison
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

dragonfruit35 wrote:
daydreamer0023 wrote:Seems like integrated circuits, such as Mindstorms/Auduinos are allowed again? Correct me if I'm wrong - I don't see too many other ways to play "the end" when you're finished.
I don't see any rules saying you're not allowed to, although I guess you could hit a play button on an mp3 player or something similar if you'd rather.
What about using a microcontoller in between transfers? ie. balloon inflates and pushes a button, button signals arduino, arduino intiates next transfer.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
User avatar
daydreamer0023
Member
Member
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:44 pm
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by daydreamer0023 »

ScottMaurer19 wrote:
dragonfruit35 wrote:
daydreamer0023 wrote:Seems like integrated circuits, such as Mindstorms/Auduinos are allowed again? Correct me if I'm wrong - I don't see too many other ways to play "the end" when you're finished.
I don't see any rules saying you're not allowed to, although I guess you could hit a play button on an mp3 player or something similar if you'd rather.
What about using a microcontoller in between transfers? ie. balloon inflates and pushes a button, button signals arduino, arduino intiates next transfer.
I don't see anything in the rules against that...though I think that if you use an arduino for the middle, you'll need to use something else for the end?
"I am among those who think that science has great beauty. A scientist in his laboratory is not only a technician: he is also a child placed before natural phenomena which impress him like a fairy tale." - Marie Curie

Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23

See resources I helped create here!
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

daydreamer0023 wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote:
dragonfruit35 wrote:
I don't see any rules saying you're not allowed to, although I guess you could hit a play button on an mp3 player or something similar if you'd rather.
What about using a microcontoller in between transfers? ie. balloon inflates and pushes a button, button signals arduino, arduino intiates next transfer.
I don't see anything in the rules against that...though I think that if you use an arduino for the middle, you'll need to use something else for the end?
You could probably use it for both. But if they dont want us doing that I'm not sure how they expect us to use a photocell without someone to receive inputs from it.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
User avatar
daydreamer0023
Member
Member
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:44 pm
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by daydreamer0023 »

ScottMaurer19 wrote:
daydreamer0023 wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote: What about using a microcontoller in between transfers? ie. balloon inflates and pushes a button, button signals arduino, arduino intiates next transfer.
I don't see anything in the rules against that...though I think that if you use an arduino for the middle, you'll need to use something else for the end?
You could probably use it for both. But if they dont want us doing that I'm not sure how they expect us to use a photocell without someone to receive inputs from it.
Wait you're right. I misread. :/ It said that each movable/adjustable physical object in the device must be utilized for at least one action. So Arduinos not included.

Also, for the single battery source bonus, would only a single physical battery qualify for this (ie. 4 AA 1.5 V batteries wired together wouldn't count because the source is made of 4 separate batteries)? How was this scored in the past?
"I am among those who think that science has great beauty. A scientist in his laboratory is not only a technician: he is also a child placed before natural phenomena which impress him like a fairy tale." - Marie Curie

Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23

See resources I helped create here!
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

daydreamer0023 wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote:
daydreamer0023 wrote:
I don't see anything in the rules against that...though I think that if you use an arduino for the middle, you'll need to use something else for the end?
You could probably use it for both. But if they dont want us doing that I'm not sure how they expect us to use a photocell without someone to receive inputs from it.
Wait you're right. I misread. :/ It said that each movable/adjustable physical object in the device must be utilized for at least one action. So Arduinos not included.

Also, for the single battery source bonus, would only a single physical battery qualify for this (ie. 4 AA 1.5 V batteries wired together wouldn't count because the source is made of 4 separate batteries)? How was this scored in the past?
Just a heads up for everyone, SO has banned Lithium batteries per the battery policy.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80

Return to “Mission Possible C”