Usually, but an exception is in this invitational. There are too many teams, which doesn't support teams getting medals as often.
Even so the JT invitational had 69 teams and people from my school still medaled
Usually, but an exception is in this invitational. There are too many teams, which doesn't support teams getting medals as often.
JT had 69 teams, and gave medals for top 6, bearso is giving medals for the top 10%, about a similar percentage
Oh, so the BearSo invy will be comparable to the JT invitational from last year.Umaroth wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 11:38 amJT had 69 teams, and gave medals for top 6, bearso is giving medals for the top 10%, about a similar percentage
In terms of competition I am not sure. At JT invite for top teams we had Kennedy with two teams that consistently medalled, JT with two consistent teams, and Kraemer with one consistent team. For BEARSO we have Kennedy with probably two teams that will consistently medal, Jeffrey Trail again with two strong teams, Churchill who will have at least one strong team, Sierra Vista probably with at least one fairly strong team, Piedmont IB, and perhaps Dodgen, Preston, Oak Valley, Eagle View, and Harlan Rowe for teams I would expect to earn some medals. We also have to consider the fact that JT invite was the last invitational of the season for SoCal whereas this is the first invitational in the country.
Its gonna get way harder for sure. I predict that Kennedy is gonna medal in at least 15 events.Umaroth wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 11:53 amIn terms of competition I am not sure. At JT invite for top teams we had Kennedy with two teams that consistently medalled, JT with two consistent teams, and Kraemer with one consistent team. For BEARSO we have Kennedy with probably two teams that will consistently medal, Jeffrey Trail again with two strong teams, Churchill who will have at least one strong team, Sierra Vista probably with at least one fairly strong team, Piedmont IB, and perhaps Dodgen, Preston, Oak Valley, Eagle View, and Harlan Rowe for teams I would expect to earn some medals. We also have to consider the fact that JT invite was the last invitational of the season for SoCal whereas this is the first invitational in the country.
Yeah, like we're not the best in all of our events but we definitely do have a few events where we could probably place.sneepity wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 4:53 amMaybe you guys are great at an event everyone else does relatively worse in some hope can't hurt, right?Efesa wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 10:32 pmI don't think anyone from my slightly above-average school would get a medal. There has to be like at least 80 teams in division B.pepperonipi wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 9:58 pm
This invitational is literally going to be so crazy!
If you want to actually win, your gonna have to do that so if your mindest is to win, that's 100% not extra.
Yeah I mean you could be studying a lot more than other people, but you might be studying the wrong things or not studying as efficiently as some others do.SilverBreeze wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 1:14 pm Defining what you do as normal and anything beyond that as "extra" might be a little narcissistic, no?
SciOly isn't about studying "enough." To do well competitively, it's about studying as much as your priorities and your own schedule allow you to. When you don't medal, other than external circumstances, it's typically because other teams studied more than you. Saying extra studying is studying when you don't need to is a bit odd, as you don't need to prepare for SciOly at all, so any studying could be considered extra.
As gz and others have mentioned, saying you won't do well and studying "enough" is enough can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I don't think you should refer to it as "extra studying" since it truly isn't extra.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests