As far as I know, nobody is going for splitting the cans because it adds too much error for it to be worth it.markuswso17 wrote:How many teams in Ohio split through the cans and how successful were they?4Head wrote:Is this Mentor? For the record, at OH states they were no longer the only team splitting the cans.Bazinga+ wrote: Oh yeah I know who you're talking about. However they do it by smashing the cans, which, as windu mentioned, is risky and depends on the cans' weight. Also the team you're talking about isn't getting very good accuracy, so scores around -16 at best.
Electric Vehicle C
- Bazinga+
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 383
- Joined: March 8th, 2014, 7:10 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
Innovation =/= success
-
- Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: November 14th, 2016, 11:29 am
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
I think that's what will happen as well, Mason had a crazy good run at states without splitting, so it's evident that bonus is not a huge factor when teams are close.Bazinga+ wrote:As far as I know, nobody is going for splitting the cans because it adds too much error for it to be worth it.markuswso17 wrote:How many teams in Ohio split through the cans and how successful were they?4Head wrote: Is this Mentor? For the record, at OH states they were no longer the only team splitting the cans.
2019 Sounds of Music National Champion
-
- Member
- Posts: 128
- Joined: April 30th, 2017, 12:27 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
My team was successful in splitting cans, but unfortunately, at States we hit the photogate timers at the 0.5m mark because our vehicle turned first and then went straight. While our team went back later to test without the photogate timers and was very successful, we were only able to get participation points (which meant a 50th place) because we couldn't fix the issue within the 8 minutes. We were consistently getting scores of -10 to -15 at our high school.
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Executive Board
- markuswso17
- Member
- Posts: 36
- Joined: March 19th, 2017, 11:34 am
- Division: Grad
- State: VA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
What was the average distance you were from the target and how consistent was it?MIScioly1 wrote:My team was successful in splitting cans, but unfortunately, at States we hit the photogate timers at the 0.5m mark because our vehicle turned first and then went straight. While our team went back later to test without the photogate timers and was very successful, we were only able to get participation points (which meant a 50th place) because we couldn't fix the issue within the 8 minutes. We were consistently getting scores of -10 to -15 at our high school.
Alumni
Fairfax High School Captain 2017
Electric Vehicle Nationals 4th place 2017
Email: markuswso17@gmail.com
Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/markuswso17FB
2016-2017 Events: Electric Vehicle, Forensics, Game On, Robot Arm
Fairfax High School Captain 2017
Electric Vehicle Nationals 4th place 2017
Email: markuswso17@gmail.com
Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/markuswso17FB
2016-2017 Events: Electric Vehicle, Forensics, Game On, Robot Arm
-
- Member
- Posts: 128
- Joined: April 30th, 2017, 12:27 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
We usually ended up about 5cm or less away from the target, and it was quite consistent. It was really unfortunate when we only got participation points at states, because the people who built it worked tirelessly on it - I think it would've been pretty much a guaranteed 1st if the photogate timers were 5cm further apart.markuswso17 wrote:What was the average distance you were from the target and how consistent was it?MIScioly1 wrote:My team was successful in splitting cans, but unfortunately, at States we hit the photogate timers at the 0.5m mark because our vehicle turned first and then went straight. While our team went back later to test without the photogate timers and was very successful, we were only able to get participation points (which meant a 50th place) because we couldn't fix the issue within the 8 minutes. We were consistently getting scores of -10 to -15 at our high school.
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Executive Board
- markuswso17
- Member
- Posts: 36
- Joined: March 19th, 2017, 11:34 am
- Division: Grad
- State: VA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
Did you go to any invitationals?MIScioly1 wrote:We usually ended up about 5cm or less away from the target, and it was quite consistent. It was really unfortunate when we only got participation points at states, because the people who built it worked tirelessly on it - I think it would've been pretty much a guaranteed 1st if the photogate timers were 5cm further apart.markuswso17 wrote:What was the average distance you were from the target and how consistent was it?MIScioly1 wrote:My team was successful in splitting cans, but unfortunately, at States we hit the photogate timers at the 0.5m mark because our vehicle turned first and then went straight. While our team went back later to test without the photogate timers and was very successful, we were only able to get participation points (which meant a 50th place) because we couldn't fix the issue within the 8 minutes. We were consistently getting scores of -10 to -15 at our high school.
Alumni
Fairfax High School Captain 2017
Electric Vehicle Nationals 4th place 2017
Email: markuswso17@gmail.com
Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/markuswso17FB
2016-2017 Events: Electric Vehicle, Forensics, Game On, Robot Arm
Fairfax High School Captain 2017
Electric Vehicle Nationals 4th place 2017
Email: markuswso17@gmail.com
Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/markuswso17FB
2016-2017 Events: Electric Vehicle, Forensics, Game On, Robot Arm
-
- Member
- Posts: 128
- Joined: April 30th, 2017, 12:27 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
Yes but we built a new vehicle after regionals because the initial one was very inconsistent. None of the invitational competitions used photogate timers either. We had 6 weeks between regionals and states so we had plenty of time.markuswso17 wrote:Did you go to any invitationals?MIScioly1 wrote:We usually ended up about 5cm or less away from the target, and it was quite consistent. It was really unfortunate when we only got participation points at states, because the people who built it worked tirelessly on it - I think it would've been pretty much a guaranteed 1st if the photogate timers were 5cm further apart.markuswso17 wrote: What was the average distance you were from the target and how consistent was it?
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Executive Board
- markuswso17
- Member
- Posts: 36
- Joined: March 19th, 2017, 11:34 am
- Division: Grad
- State: VA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Electric Vehicle C
What are some interesting design ideas you thought of this year? I know some attempted to plow between the cans, and there was a joke about stacking the cans and sorting it with a specially shaped plow so you would have a negative can bonus. What other interesting methods were there?
Alumni
Fairfax High School Captain 2017
Electric Vehicle Nationals 4th place 2017
Email: markuswso17@gmail.com
Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/markuswso17FB
2016-2017 Events: Electric Vehicle, Forensics, Game On, Robot Arm
Fairfax High School Captain 2017
Electric Vehicle Nationals 4th place 2017
Email: markuswso17@gmail.com
Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/markuswso17FB
2016-2017 Events: Electric Vehicle, Forensics, Game On, Robot Arm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests