If you are referring to C states, the top 6 robot scores are posted on the Robot Arm forums and I also know the top 2 tower scoresschist99centz wrote:
I'm assuming raw scores for builds will not be released?
New York 2017
-
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 1:37 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:10 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
Towers 3rd was 1750.MattH2018 wrote:If you are referring to C states, the top 6 robot scores are posted on the Robot Arm forums and I also know the top 2 tower scoresschist99centz wrote:
I'm assuming raw scores for builds will not be released?
Innovation =/= success
-
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 1:37 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
And top 2 were 2959 and 2550Bazinga+ wrote:Towers 3rd was 1750.MattH2018 wrote:If you are referring to C states, the top 6 robot scores are posted on the Robot Arm forums and I also know the top 2 tower scoresschist99centz wrote:
I'm assuming raw scores for builds will not be released?
-
- Wiki Moderator
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:27 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
Any predictions on trials next year? (topic or specific event)
i can't feel my arms wtf i think i'm turning into a lamp
voted least likely to sleep 2018, most likely to sleep in class 2017+2018, biggest procrastinator 2018
voted least likely to sleep 2018, most likely to sleep in class 2017+2018, biggest procrastinator 2018
-
- Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 7:55 am
- Division: B
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
Dear Bay Academy School,
I deeply apologize for my actions. I understand the impact it has caused. I never stopped to think how my words would be so hurtful. I should not have written such an untrue statement. In person I would never had done such a thing. But when behind screens, it was so easy for me to not stop and think, thinking of nothing but "anonymity." I've learned a difficult lesson the hard way. Please take this apology from one that never aimed to demoralize anyone. I wish the best of luck to your teams and hope that your members will accept this sincere apology.
Sincerely,
BT
I deeply apologize for my actions. I understand the impact it has caused. I never stopped to think how my words would be so hurtful. I should not have written such an untrue statement. In person I would never had done such a thing. But when behind screens, it was so easy for me to not stop and think, thinking of nothing but "anonymity." I've learned a difficult lesson the hard way. Please take this apology from one that never aimed to demoralize anyone. I wish the best of luck to your teams and hope that your members will accept this sincere apology.
Sincerely,
BT
Food Scientist, Optical Illusionist, Road Scholar, Scrambler Chef
(Excuse my puniness)
I'm a freelance Java developer!
(Excuse my puniness)
I'm a freelance Java developer!
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:10 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: New York 2017
I can say that HHHE had a bad year, our kids just didn't work as hard as they should have. I think they got a bit cocky after a 2nd place finish at regionals (though the gap between us and Ward Melville was substantial) and they felt like they could do everything last minute. We also only had 2 seniors on the team, which hurt. The other coaches and I have already been talking about what we can do for next year to improve organization and get people coming to meetings more. Attendance was a big issue, and even when people did come to meetings, they weren't very productive. We had a great group of kids but the effort just wasn't there. Hopefully next year we come back in full force.GneissGuy17 wrote:Congrats to FM and Columbia! Wow, HHHE didn't perform as well as I had expected. But props to Spack for getting 5th. How'd that happen? Great job to everyone though.
Congratulations to FM and Columbia for a fantastic showing, and props to WM for 3rd!
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
-
- Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:59 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
I believe that there was only one negative score for EV and I had a score of around 5 for my EV and placed 4th so i guess that puts the rest of the scores into perspectiveMattH2018 wrote:And top 2 were 2959 and 2550Bazinga+ wrote: Towers 3rd was 1750.
Townsend Harris
15-16
Regionals/States
EV 1/3
Robot Arm 1/42 ( tier 2)
Wright Stuff 1/4
Bridge Building 1/13
Game On -/17
16-17
Yale/Regionals/States
EV 14/1/4
Robot Arm 4/1/2
Helicopters -/2/3
Game On 20/8/10
17-18
Islip/Regionals/States
Mousetrap Vehicle 3/1/
Game On 19/8/
15-16
Regionals/States
EV 1/3
Robot Arm 1/42 ( tier 2)
Wright Stuff 1/4
Bridge Building 1/13
Game On -/17
16-17
Yale/Regionals/States
EV 14/1/4
Robot Arm 4/1/2
Helicopters -/2/3
Game On 20/8/10
17-18
Islip/Regionals/States
Mousetrap Vehicle 3/1/
Game On 19/8/
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:10 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
Seriously? Only one negative score? I expected many more considering that we were able to get double digit negative scores rather consistently.colaboy82 wrote:I believe that there was only one negative score for EV and I had a score of around 5 for my EV and placed 4th so i guess that puts the rest of the scores into perspectiveMattH2018 wrote:And top 2 were 2959 and 2550Bazinga+ wrote: Towers 3rd was 1750.
Innovation =/= success
-
- Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:59 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
Yeah, it shocked me too when I heard because I was able to get negative scores pretty consistently also. Maybe the competition nerves got to everyone ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. I am pretty sure there was only one negative score but I would not be surprised if I am wrong because that would also mean second and third place had to be from 0 - 4 points and that seems like a very small variation.Bazinga+ wrote:Seriously? Only one negative score? I expected many more considering that we were able to get double digit negative scores rather consistently.colaboy82 wrote:I believe that there was only one negative score for EV and I had a score of around 5 for my EV and placed 4th so i guess that puts the rest of the scores into perspectiveMattH2018 wrote: And top 2 were 2959 and 2550
Townsend Harris
15-16
Regionals/States
EV 1/3
Robot Arm 1/42 ( tier 2)
Wright Stuff 1/4
Bridge Building 1/13
Game On -/17
16-17
Yale/Regionals/States
EV 14/1/4
Robot Arm 4/1/2
Helicopters -/2/3
Game On 20/8/10
17-18
Islip/Regionals/States
Mousetrap Vehicle 3/1/
Game On 19/8/
15-16
Regionals/States
EV 1/3
Robot Arm 1/42 ( tier 2)
Wright Stuff 1/4
Bridge Building 1/13
Game On -/17
16-17
Yale/Regionals/States
EV 14/1/4
Robot Arm 4/1/2
Helicopters -/2/3
Game On 20/8/10
17-18
Islip/Regionals/States
Mousetrap Vehicle 3/1/
Game On 19/8/
-
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 1:37 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
Iirc 3rd was around 1colaboy82 wrote:Yeah, it shocked me too when I heard because I was able to get negative scores pretty consistently also. Maybe the competition nerves got to everyone ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. I am pretty sure there was only one negative score but I would not be surprised if I am wrong because that would also mean second and third place had to be from 0 - 4 points and that seems like a very small variation.Bazinga+ wrote:Seriously? Only one negative score? I expected many more considering that we were able to get double digit negative scores rather consistently.colaboy82 wrote:
I believe that there was only one negative score for EV and I had a score of around 5 for my EV and placed 4th so i guess that puts the rest of the scores into perspective